McDermott D F, Mier J W, Lawrence D P, van den Brink M R, Clancy M A, Rubin K M, Atkins M B
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Jun;6(6):2201-8.
In an effort to develop a biochemotherapy regimen for metastatic melanoma suitable for testing in a cooperative group setting, we modified the concurrent biochemotherapy regimen of S. S. Legha et al. (J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 1752-1759, 1998) by providing enhanced supportive care and developing a strict, conservative approach to the management of treatment-related toxicities. Patients received cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD: cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and vinblastine (1.2 mg/m2) on days 1-4, dacarbazine (800 mg/m2) on day 1 only) concurrently with interleukin 2 (9 MIU/m2/day) by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-4 and IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2/day) on days 1-5, 8, 10, and 12. Prophylactic antibiotics and a maximum of four cycles were administered. Routine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and aggressive antiemetics were initiated after patients 7 and 14, respectively. Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No patients had received prior chemotherapy or interleukin 2; however, 23 (53%) had received prior IFN-alpha, mostly in the adjuvant setting. A total of 131 treatment cycles was administered. Significant toxicities requiring dose modification included: hypotension requiring pressors (15 episodes in 11 patients), grades 3/4 vomiting (12 episodes in 15 cycles; 5 episodes in 12 patients (6 episodes in 9 cycles after initiation of the modified antiemetic regimen), transient renal insufficiency (5 episodes in 5 patients), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (24 episodes, 1 associated with bleeding), neutropenia with or without fever (15 instances, only 11 in 112 cycles after routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), and catheter-related bacteremia (2 patients). Five (16%) of 30 patients who were treated after the last protocol modification experienced what we defined as unacceptable toxicity for a cooperative group setting. Responses were seen in 19 of 40 evaluable patients (relative risk, 48%) with 8 complete responses (20%). The median response duration was 7 months (range, 1-17+ months) with one currently ongoing. The central nervous system was the initial site of relapse in 11 responding patients. The median survival duration was 11 months (range, 2-31 months). This modified, concurrent biochemotherapy regimen is active and tolerable for use in a cooperative group setting. Central nervous system relapse, however, remains a concern for responders. This regimen is being compared with CVD in a Phase III Intergroup Trial (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group 3695).
为了开发一种适合在协作组环境中进行测试的转移性黑色素瘤生物化疗方案,我们对S. S. Legha等人(《临床肿瘤学杂志》,16: 1752 - 1759, 1998)的同步生物化疗方案进行了修改,加强了支持治疗,并制定了严格、保守的方法来管理与治疗相关的毒性反应。患者接受顺铂、长春碱和达卡巴嗪(CVD:顺铂(20 mg/m²)和长春碱(1.2 mg/m²)于第1 - 4天给药,达卡巴嗪(800 mg/m²)仅在第1天给药),同时在第1 - 4天通过持续静脉输注给予白细胞介素2(9 MIU/m²/天),并在第1、5、8、10和12天给予干扰素-α(5 MU/m²/天)。给予预防性抗生素,最多进行四个周期的治疗。分别在患者治疗7天和14天后开始常规使用粒细胞集落刺激因子和积极的止吐药。44例患者纳入本研究。所有患者均未接受过先前的化疗或白细胞介素2治疗;然而,23例(53%)曾接受过先前的干扰素-α治疗,大多为辅助治疗。共进行了131个治疗周期。需要调整剂量的显著毒性反应包括:需要使用升压药的低血压(11例患者共15次发作)、3/4级呕吐(15个周期共12次发作;12例患者共5次发作(在改良止吐方案开始后9个周期中有6次发作))、短暂性肾功能不全(5例患者共5次发作)、4级血小板减少(24次发作,1次与出血相关)、有或无发热的中性粒细胞减少(15例,在常规使用粒细胞集落刺激因子后的112个周期中仅11例)以及导管相关菌血症(2例患者)。在最后一次方案修改后接受治疗的30例患者中有5例(16%)出现了我们定义为协作组环境中不可接受的毒性反应。40例可评估患者中有19例出现反应(相对风险,48%),其中8例完全缓解(20%)。中位反应持续时间为7个月(范围,1 - 17 +个月),有1例仍在进行中。11例有反应的患者中枢神经系统是复发的初始部位。中位生存持续时间为11个月(范围,2 - 31个月)。这种改良的同步生物化疗方案在协作组环境中是有效的且可耐受的。然而,中枢神经系统复发仍是有反应患者的一个问题。该方案正在一项III期组间试验(东部肿瘤协作组/西南肿瘤协作组3695)中与CVD方案进行比较。