Marshall G N, Morales L S, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Hays R D
RAND, Health Sciences, 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, California 90407-2138, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2001 Jun;13(2):216-29. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.2.216.
The National Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) Benchmarking Database was used to assess the factor structure and invariance of the CAHPS 1.0 Core Survey. Separate analyses were conducted with Latino and non-Latino Caucasian consumers drawn from commercial and Medicaid sectors (N = 15,092). Results demonstrated that the 23 CAHPS 1.0 report items measure consumer reports of experiences with 5 aspects of health plan performance: Access to Care, Timeliness of Care, Provider Communication, Health Plan Consumer Service, and Office Staff Helpfulness. Four items assessed global ratings of care. Analyses revealed an identical pattern of fixed and free factor loadings across all samples. Magnitude of factor loadings and correlations among factors was essentially equivalent within a common health service sector. A higher order factor analysis revealed that rating and reports of care showed marked convergence.
国家健康计划消费者评估研究(CAHPS)基准数据库被用于评估CAHPS 1.0核心调查问卷的因子结构和不变性。对来自商业和医疗补助部门的拉丁裔和非拉丁裔白人消费者进行了单独分析(N = 15,092)。结果表明,CAHPS 1.0的23个报告项目衡量了消费者对健康计划绩效5个方面体验的报告:获得医疗服务、医疗及时性、提供者沟通、健康计划消费者服务以及办公室工作人员的帮助程度。4个项目评估了整体护理评级。分析显示,所有样本中固定和自由因子载荷的模式相同。在同一个健康服务部门内,因子载荷的大小和因子之间的相关性基本相当。高阶因子分析表明,护理评级和报告显示出明显的趋同性。