Allard P, Maunsell E, Labbé J, Dorval M
Epidemiology Research Group, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
J Palliat Med. 2001 Summer;4(2):191-203. doi: 10.1089/109662101750290227.
Inadequate pain control is a dismaying reality in cancer patients.
To review studies on cancer pain control interventions, and describe their findings with respect to participants' attitudes and knowledge, pain management, and pain levels.
Computer searches were made in MEDLINE from January 1962, in PsychLIT from January 1974, and in CINAHL from January 1982 to August 1999, using a search strategy based on a combination of key words.
Computerized listings from these sources contained 383, 26, and 85 articles, respectively. After exclusion of duplicates, abstracts, editorials, letters, and irrelevant articles, we retained for review 33 articles, of which 25 (76%) were interventions targeting health professionals, and 8 (24%) interventions targeting patients and family caregivers.
Study reports were reviewed using the following structured framework: Intervention Setting, Study Methods, Process Assessment, and Pain Outcome Assessment (Attitudes and Knowledge, Pain Management, and Pain Relief/Quality of Life).
Educational interventions can successfully improve cancer pain knowledge and attitudes of health care professionals, but without having much impact on patients' pain levels. The most promising avenue for improving cancer pain control in ambulatory settings may be brief, nursing interventions targeting patients in combination with a daily pain diary. This review suggests that further progress may occur through incorporating a systematic and valid method of documenting daily fluctuation in pain levels, and ensuring that documented uncontrolled pain is followed rapidly by clinical reassessment and dose adjustment.
癌症患者疼痛控制不足是一个令人沮丧的现实。
回顾癌症疼痛控制干预措施的研究,并描述其在参与者态度和知识、疼痛管理及疼痛程度方面的研究结果。
1962年1月至1999年8月期间,利用基于关键词组合的检索策略,分别在医学文献数据库(MEDLINE,检索时间从1962年1月起)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychLIT,检索时间从1974年1月起)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL,检索时间从1982年1月起)中进行计算机检索。
这些来源的计算机检索清单分别包含383篇、26篇和85篇文章。排除重复、摘要、社论、信函及不相关文章后,我们保留33篇文章供审查,其中25篇(76%)是针对卫生专业人员的干预措施,8篇(24%)是针对患者及家庭护理人员的干预措施。
使用以下结构化框架对研究报告进行审查:干预背景、研究方法、过程评估及疼痛结果评估(态度和知识、疼痛管理以及疼痛缓解/生活质量)。
教育干预措施能够成功提高卫生保健专业人员对癌症疼痛的认识和态度,但对患者的疼痛程度影响不大。在门诊环境中改善癌症疼痛控制最有前景的途径可能是针对患者的简短护理干预措施并结合每日疼痛日记。本综述表明,通过采用一种系统有效的方法记录疼痛程度的每日波动情况,并确保对记录的未控制疼痛迅速进行临床重新评估和剂量调整,可能会取得进一步进展。