Jaeger T M, Lohr R H, Pankratz V S
Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Jul;76(7):695-701. doi: 10.4065/76.7.695.
To assess the efficacy of symptom-triggered therapy vs usual care for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in medical inpatients.
This study was a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to general medical services between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1998, who experienced AWS during the admission. This study was conducted at Saint Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minn. Patients were identified from hospital discharge diagnoses and pharmacy data. Symptom-triggered therapy for AWS was initiated in 1997. Patients were divided into preimplementation (1995-1996) and postimplementation (1997-1998) cohorts. Age, sex, medical comorbid conditions, previous AWS (including seizures and delirium tremens), duration of treatment for AWS, benzodiazepine use and dose, complications of AWS, and adverse outcomes of treatment during the incident admission were abstracted from the medical records of eligible patients. Comorbid conditions were classified according to the Charlson comorbidity index. Differences between the cohorts were assessed with use of logistic regression models and analysis of covariance.
Review of medical records from 638 admissions (536 patients) yielded 216 admissions eligible for this study. After adjustment for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, previous AWS, previous alcohol withdrawal seizures, and previous delirium tremens, we found no significant difference between cohorts for duration of treatment (P=.16), benzodiazepine use (P=.21), total dose of benzodiazepine (P=.38), or total complication rate (P=.053). We did observe a significant difference in the occurrence of delirium tremens between the 2 treatment groups (P=.04). This was especially apparent for patients with no history of delirium tremens.
Symptom-triggered therapy is effective treatment for AWS in medical inpatients. In this retrospective study, it did not result in shorter duration of treatment but was associated with a decreased occurrence of delirium tremens, the most severe and life-threatening complication of AWS. This result was most apparent in patients with no history of delirium tremens.
评估症状触发疗法与常规护理对内科住院患者酒精戒断综合征(AWS)的疗效。
本研究是对1995年1月1日至1998年12月31日期间入住综合内科且在住院期间出现AWS的患者进行的回顾性分析。该研究在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市的圣玛丽医院开展。通过医院出院诊断和药房数据确定患者。1997年开始对AWS采用症状触发疗法。患者被分为实施前(1995 - 1996年)和实施后(1997 - 1998年)队列。从符合条件患者的病历中提取年龄、性别、内科合并症、既往AWS(包括癫痫发作和震颤谵妄)、AWS治疗持续时间、苯二氮䓬类药物使用情况及剂量、AWS并发症以及本次住院期间治疗的不良结局。根据查尔森合并症指数对合并症进行分类。使用逻辑回归模型和协方差分析评估队列之间的差异。
回顾638例住院病例(536例患者)的病历,有216例住院病例符合本研究条件。在对年龄、性别、查尔森合并症指数、既往AWS、既往酒精戒断癫痫发作和既往震颤谵妄进行调整后,我们发现队列之间在治疗持续时间(P = 0.16)、苯二氮䓬类药物使用情况(P = 0.21)、苯二氮䓬类药物总剂量(P = 0.38)或总并发症发生率(P = 0.053)方面无显著差异。我们确实观察到两个治疗组在震颤谵妄发生率上存在显著差异(P = 0.04)。这在无震颤谵妄病史的患者中尤为明显。
症状触发疗法是内科住院患者AWS的有效治疗方法。在这项回顾性研究中,它并未导致治疗持续时间缩短,但与AWS最严重且危及生命的并发症震颤谵妄的发生率降低相关。这一结果在无震颤谵妄病史的患者中最为明显。