Suppr超能文献

综合医院中酒精戒断症状触发疗法的不当使用。

Inappropriate use of symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal in the general hospital.

作者信息

Hecksel Kathleen A, Bostwick J Michael, Jaeger Thomas M, Cha Stephen S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Mar;83(3):274-9. doi: 10.4065/83.3.274.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if hospitalized medical and surgical patients were placed inappropriately on symptom-triggered therapy (STT) for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) and if certain conditions were more likely to be associated with inappropriate STT use or adverse events.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly selected 124 (25%) of the 495 Mayo Clinic inpatients who received STT according to the Revised Clinical Institute for Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA-Ar) protocol in 2003 and assessed them for STT appropriateness, defined as having both intact verbal communication and recent alcohol use. Adverse events, including delirium tremens, seizures, or death, were correlated with CIWA-Ar appropriateness.

RESULTS

Of the 124 randomly selected patients, only 60 (48%) met both inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 64 patients, 9 (14%) were drinkers but could not communicate, and 35 (55%) could communicate but had not been drinking. Twenty (31%) met neither criterion. Univariate analysis identified a significant association between inappropriate initiation and chronic heart failure, postoperative status (POS), liver disease (LD), nonmetastatic cancer, and chemical dependency consultation. On multivariate analysis, only LD (P equals .02) and POS (P equals .01) retained significance, with LD more and POS less likely to predict appropriateness. Seven of 11 patients who experienced adverse events had received STT according to the CIWA-Ar protocol (P equals .05). Univariate analysis identified a significant association between adverse events and a history of alcohol dependence or AWS. Multivariate analysis showed significance only for a history of alcohol dependence (P equals .049).

CONCLUSION

Fewer than half of the randomly selected patients met both of the inclusion criteria for the CIWA-Ar instrument, leading us to conclude that more stringent evaluation is needed. Particularly postoperatively, alternative explanations for putative AWS should be sought. Health care professionals should more aggressively seek information on recent alcohol use from medical records, family members, and patients themselves.

摘要

目的

确定住院的内科和外科患者是否被不恰当地采用了针对酒精戒断综合征(AWS)的症状触发疗法(STT),以及某些情况是否更有可能与不恰当使用STT或不良事件相关。

患者与方法

我们从2003年按照修订的酒精戒断临床研究所评估量表(CIWA-Ar)方案接受STT的495名梅奥诊所住院患者中随机选取了124名(25%),并评估他们使用STT的恰当性,恰当性定义为具备完整的言语交流能力且近期有饮酒。将包括震颤谵妄、癫痫发作或死亡在内的不良事件与CIWA-Ar恰当性进行关联分析。

结果

在随机选取的124名患者中,只有60名(48%)符合两项纳入标准。其余64名患者中,9名(14%)是饮酒者但无法交流,35名(55%)能够交流但近期未饮酒。20名(31%)两项标准均不符合。单因素分析发现不恰当起始与慢性心力衰竭、术后状态(POS)、肝脏疾病(LD)、非转移性癌症以及药物依赖会诊之间存在显著关联。多因素分析显示,只有LD(P = 0.02)和POS(P = 0.01)仍具有显著性,LD更有可能、而POS不太可能预测恰当性。11名发生不良事件的患者中有7名是按照CIWA-Ar方案接受的STT(P = 0.05)。单因素分析发现不良事件与酒精依赖或AWS病史之间存在显著关联。多因素分析仅显示酒精依赖病史具有显著性(P = 0.049)。

结论

随机选取的患者中不到一半符合CIWA-Ar工具的两项纳入标准,这使我们得出结论,需要进行更严格的评估。特别是在术后,应寻找对假定的AWS的其他解释。医护人员应更积极地从病历、家庭成员和患者本人那里获取近期饮酒情况的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验