Then K L, Rankin J A, Fofonoff D A
Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Heart Lung. 2001 Jul-Aug;30(4):285-93. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2001.116010.
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical manifestations of first-time acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 3 age groups of men and women who presented to the emergency departments of 3 acute tertiary care hospitals.
An exploratory, descriptive design was used, and there were 2 phases to the project. Phase 1 was a retrospective chart audit of a systematic random sample of patient charts, and phase 2 included a structured interview of a prospective random sample of emergency and intensive care unit nurses and physicians. The data were collected by using a chart audit tool and a semistructured interview, respectively.
The study took place at a western Canada university affiliated with acute tertiary care centres.
A systematic random sample of 153 (105 men and 48 women) patient charts were audited from the health records departments of 3 acute care hospitals. All of the patients had experienced a first-time AMI. In addition, a random sample of emergency/intensive care unit nurses (n = 60) and physicians (n = 18) was interviewed.
The results indicate that a statistically significant number of the oldest (75 years or older) male patients present with atypical manifestations of AMI compared with the men in the younger age groups (P =.005). The same trend was not noted for female patients. The results of the study are limited with respect to the small number of women in each age category. Caution must therefore be exercised in generalizing the results to the target population of women with AMI. The atypical manifestations are described. The results of the interviews revealed that many clinicians do not look for different clinical manifestations when assessing older patients.
It is essential that nurses and physicians accurately assess patients with AMI, especially patients in the older age groups who may be presenting atypically. It is also important that professional and nonprofessional public health education initiatives include information regarding both typical and atypical presentation of AMI, particularly in the older patient.
本研究旨在比较3家急性三级护理医院急诊科收治的3个年龄组男性和女性首次急性心肌梗死(AMI)的临床表现。
采用探索性描述性设计,该项目分为两个阶段。第一阶段是对患者病历系统随机样本进行回顾性图表审核,第二阶段包括对急诊科和重症监护病房护士及医生的前瞻性随机样本进行结构化访谈。数据分别通过图表审核工具和半结构化访谈收集。
研究在加拿大西部一所与急性三级护理中心相关的大学进行。
从3家急性护理医院的健康记录部门抽取了153份患者病历(105名男性和48名女性)进行系统随机抽样审核。所有患者均经历过首次AMI。此外,随机抽取了急诊科/重症监护病房护士(n = 60)和医生(n = 18)进行访谈。
结果表明,与年轻年龄组的男性相比,年龄最大(75岁及以上)的男性患者出现AMI非典型表现的数量具有统计学意义(P = 0.005)。女性患者未观察到相同趋势。由于每个年龄组女性数量较少,本研究结果存在局限性。因此,在将结果推广到AMI女性目标人群时必须谨慎。文中描述了非典型表现。访谈结果显示,许多临床医生在评估老年患者时并未寻找不同的临床表现。
护士和医生准确评估AMI患者至关重要,尤其是可能表现出非典型症状的老年患者。专业和非专业公共健康教育举措纳入有关AMI典型和非典型表现的信息也很重要,特别是针对老年患者。