Suppr超能文献

[丹麦多学科疼痛中心治疗的慢性非恶性疼痛患者与全科医疗相比的治疗结果。一项随机对照临床试验]

[Therapeutic results in chronic, non-malignant pain in patients treated at a Danish multidisciplinary pain center compared with general practice. A randomized controlled clinical trial].

作者信息

Becker N, Sjøgren P, Olsen A K, Eriksen J

机构信息

H:S Rigshospitalet, Tvaerfagligt Smertecenter, afsnit 7612.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 2001 May 28;163(22):3078-82.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multidisciplinary pain treatment (MPT) is generally considered to be the most effective treatment of chronic pain, but its long-term effect has not yet been firmly established.

METHODS

This randomised controlled study compared the effect of outpatient MPT with that of treatment by general practitioners after initial supervision by a pain specialist (GP group) and with a six-month waiting list group (WL group). The participants were 189 patients with chronic non-malignant pain. On referral and at three and six months, the patients filled in questionnaires evaluating pain intensity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and the use of analgesics.

RESULTS

At six months, the patients allocated to MPT (N = 63) reported a reduction in pain intensity (p < 0.001), and an improvement in psychological well-being (p < 0.001), quality of sleep (p < 0.05), and physical functioning (p < 0.05). The WL group (N = 63) had a statistically significant deterioration in most of the HRQL measures. The only effect of treatment found in the GP group was a reduction in the use of short-acting opioids. In the MPT group, the use of opioids administered on demand and short-acting opioids was decreased (p < 0.001). No change in the use of analgesics was seen in the WL group.

DISCUSSION

The study showed that (i) in the MPT group there was a significant reduction in pain intensity and an improvement in HRQL compared to the WL group, and (ii) the mere establishment of a pain diagnosis and management plan by a specialist was not sufficient to enable the referring GP to manage patients with severe chronic pain.

摘要

引言

多学科疼痛治疗(MPT)通常被认为是慢性疼痛最有效的治疗方法,但其长期效果尚未得到确凿证实。

方法

这项随机对照研究比较了门诊多学科疼痛治疗与在疼痛专科医生初步指导后由全科医生进行治疗(全科医生组)以及与六个月等待名单组(WL组)的效果。参与者为189例慢性非恶性疼痛患者。在转诊时以及三个月和六个月时,患者填写问卷评估疼痛强度、健康相关生活质量(HRQL)以及镇痛药的使用情况。

结果

在六个月时,分配到多学科疼痛治疗组(N = 63)的患者报告疼痛强度降低(p < 0.001),心理健康状况改善(p < 0.001)、睡眠质量改善(p < 0.05)以及身体功能改善(p < 0.05)。等待名单组(N = 63)在大多数健康相关生活质量指标上有统计学意义的恶化。在全科医生组中发现的唯一治疗效果是短效阿片类药物的使用减少。在多学科疼痛治疗组中,按需使用的阿片类药物和短效阿片类药物的使用减少(p < 0.001)。在等待名单组中未观察到镇痛药使用的变化。

讨论

该研究表明,(i)与等待名单组相比,多学科疼痛治疗组的疼痛强度显著降低且健康相关生活质量得到改善,以及(ii)仅由专科医生建立疼痛诊断和管理计划不足以使转诊的全科医生管理重度慢性疼痛患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验