Becker N, Sjøgren P, Bech P, Olsen A K, Eriksen J
H:S Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Danish National Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Tagensvej 18B, 7122, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pain. 2000 Feb;84(2-3):203-11. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00209-2.
This randomised controlled study investigated the effect of outpatient multidisciplinary pain centre treatment (MPT) compared with treatment by a general practitioner after initial supervision by a pain specialist (GP-group) and with a group of patients waiting for 6 months before treatment was initiated (WL-group). One-hundred-and-eighty-nine chronic non-malignant pain patients were studied. At referral, and after 3 and 6 months patients filled in questionnaires evaluating pain intensity, health related quality of life (HRQL) and use of analgesics. HRQL was evaluated using the Medical Outcome Study-Short Form (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD) and the Psychological General Well-being Scale (PGWB). After 6 months patients allocated to MPT (n=63) reported statistically significant reduction in pain intensity (VAS-score, P<0.001), improvement in psychological well-being (PGWB, P<0.001), quality of sleep (P<0.05) and physical functioning (SF-36-Phycical Functioning, P<0.05). No improvements were seen in the GP-group (n=63). In the WL-group (n=63) a statistically significant deterioration was observed in PGWB-scores, HAD-scores and in 6 of 8 SF-36-subscores (P </= 0.05). A reduction in use of opioids administered on demand was obtained in the group receiving MPT (P<0.001). In the MPT- and GP-groups a decrease in the use of short acting opioids was observed (P<0.01). No change in use of analgesics was seen in the WL-group. The study showed that (i) in the MPT-group there was a significant reduction in pain intensity and improvement of HRQL compared to the WL-group, and (ii) the mere establishment of a pain diagnosis and a pain management plan by a pain specialist was not sufficient to enable the referring GP to manage severely chronic pain patients.
这项随机对照研究调查了门诊多学科疼痛中心治疗(MPT)的效果,并将其与在疼痛专科医生初步指导后由全科医生进行治疗的效果(GP组)以及一组在开始治疗前等待6个月的患者的效果(WL组)进行比较。研究了189名慢性非恶性疼痛患者。在转诊时以及3个月和6个月后,患者填写问卷,评估疼痛强度、健康相关生活质量(HRQL)和镇痛药的使用情况。使用医学结局研究简表(SF-36)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)和心理总体幸福感量表(PGWB)评估HRQL。6个月后,分配到MPT组(n=63)的患者报告疼痛强度有统计学显著降低(视觉模拟评分法[VAS]评分,P<0.001),心理健康状况(PGWB,P<0.001)、睡眠质量(P<0.05)和身体功能(SF-36身体功能,P<0.05)有所改善。GP组(n=63)未见改善。在WL组(n=63)中,观察到PGWB评分、HAD评分以及8个SF-36子评分中的6个有统计学显著恶化(P≤0.05)。接受MPT治疗的组按需使用阿片类药物的情况有所减少(P<0.001)。在MPT组和GP组中,短效阿片类药物的使用有所减少(P<0.01)。WL组的镇痛药使用情况未见变化。该研究表明,(i)与WL组相比,MPT组的疼痛强度显著降低,HRQL有所改善;(ii)仅由疼痛专科医生做出疼痛诊断并制定疼痛管理计划不足以使转诊的全科医生管理严重的慢性疼痛患者。