Watson C J, Leddy H M, Dynjan T D, Parham J L
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75390-8876, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Jul;31(7):368-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.7.368.
Test-retest reliability with blinded testers.
To determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the lateral pull test and patellar tilt test.
If patellar malalignment can be detected by clinical examination, then condition-specific treatment interventions may be implemented in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. However, several clinical tests used to assess patellar mobility have recently been shown to have poor to fair reliability. Because the lateral pull test and the patellar tilt test are widely used clinically as diagnostic tests for patellofemoral pain syndrome but have not been previously tested for reliability, we examined these tests.
Fifty-two subjects (age range, 21-48 years) provided 95 knees (19 symptomatic and 76 asymptomatic) for assessment of the lateral pull test. Two testers, blinded to the presence or absence of symptoms, independently performed the lateral pull test in random order. Fifty-five subjects (age range, 22-42 years) provided 99 knees (73 asymptomatic and 26 symptomatic) for assessment of the patellar tilt test. Three blinded testers independently performed the patellar tilt test in random order. All subjects were tested and retested within 3-5 days. A kappa (kappa) statistic was used to assess the agreement of findings within each tester and between testers.
The kappa coefficients for intrarater reliability varied from 0.39 to 0.47 for the lateral pull test and from 0.44 to 0.50 for the patellar tilt test, while the coefficients for interrater reliability were 0.31 for the lateral pull test and varied from 0.20 to 0.35 for the tilt test.
Repeated lateral pull tests and patellar tilt tests had fair intrarater and poor interrater reliability. Our results suggest that care must be taken in placing too much emphasis on these tests when making clinical decisions.
采用盲法测试者的重测信度。
确定侧方牵拉试验和髌骨倾斜试验的组内及组间评定者信度。
如果能通过临床检查检测到髌骨排列不齐,那么针对髌股疼痛综合征患者可实施特定病情的治疗干预措施。然而,最近有研究表明,用于评估髌骨活动度的几种临床检查的信度较差至尚可。由于侧方牵拉试验和髌骨倾斜试验在临床上被广泛用作髌股疼痛综合征的诊断检查,但此前尚未进行过信度测试,因此我们对这些检查进行了研究。
52名受试者(年龄范围21 - 48岁)提供了95个膝关节(19个有症状,76个无症状)用于侧方牵拉试验的评估。两名对症状存在与否不知情的测试者以随机顺序独立进行侧方牵拉试验。55名受试者(年龄范围22 - 42岁)提供了99个膝关节(73个无症状,26个有症状)用于髌骨倾斜试验的评估。三名盲法测试者以随机顺序独立进行髌骨倾斜试验。所有受试者在3 - 5天内接受测试和重新测试。采用kappa统计量评估每位测试者内部以及测试者之间结果的一致性。
侧方牵拉试验的组内信度kappa系数在0.39至0.47之间,髌骨倾斜试验的组内信度kappa系数在0.44至0.50之间,而侧方牵拉试验的组间信度系数为0.31,髌骨倾斜试验的组间信度系数在0.20至0.35之间。
重复进行侧方牵拉试验和髌骨倾斜试验的组内信度尚可,组间信度较差。我们的结果表明,在临床决策时,对这些检查结果不宜过分依赖。