• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Once-daily oral gatifloxacin versus oral levofloxacin in treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections: double-blind, multicenter, randomized study.每日一次口服加替沙星与口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性皮肤及软组织感染的双盲、多中心、随机研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Aug;45(8):2358-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.8.2358-2362.2001.
2
A multicentre, double-blind, randomised study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.一项多中心、双盲、随机研究,比较口服左氧氟沙星与环丙沙星治疗单纯性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性。
Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;52(2):69-74.
3
Gatifloxacin 400 mg as a single shot or 200 mg once daily for 3 days is as effective as ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.加替沙星400毫克单次注射或每日200毫克连用3天,在治疗非复杂性尿路感染患者方面与环丙沙星每日250毫克分两次服用的效果相同。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Jun;23(6):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.12.017.
4
Cefdinir versus levofloxacin in patients with acute rhinosinusitis of presumed bacterial etiology: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.头孢地尼与左氧氟沙星治疗疑似细菌性病因的急性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的多中心、随机、双盲研究。
Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):2026-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.004.
5
A phase III clinical trial of 0.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution versus 0.3% ofloxacin ophthalmic solution for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.一项比较0.5%左氧氟沙星滴眼液与0.3%氧氟沙星滴眼液治疗细菌性结膜炎的III期临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Mar;110(3):457-65. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01894-8.
6
Fleroxacin 400 mg once daily versus ofloxacin 400 mg twice daily in skin and soft tissue infections.
Chemotherapy. 1997 Sep-Oct;43(5):378-84. doi: 10.1159/000239593.
7
A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized comparison of oral levofloxacin and oral clarithromycin in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6):1255-63.
8
Once-daily ofloxacin otic solution versus neomycin sulfate/polymyxin B sulfate/hydrocortisone otic suspension four times a day: a multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and pain relief in pediatric patients with otitis externa.每日一次的氧氟沙星耳用溶液与每日四次的硫酸新霉素/硫酸多粘菌素B/氢化可的松耳用混悬液对比:一项多中心、随机、评估者盲法试验,比较小儿外耳道炎患者的疗效、安全性及疼痛缓解情况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1725-36. doi: 10.1185/030079906X121057.
9
Sparfloxacin versus ciprofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired, complicated skin and skin-structure infections.司帕沙星与环丙沙星治疗社区获得性复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的比较
Clin Ther. 1999 Apr;21(4):675-90. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88319-8.
10
Single-dose gatifloxacin compared with ofloxacin for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial.单剂量加替沙星与氧氟沙星治疗单纯性淋病的比较:一项随机、双盲、多中心试验。
Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Mar;28(3):136-42. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200103000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Insufficient Representation of Patients With Obesity in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobials for Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Scoping Review.评估抗菌药物治疗皮肤和皮肤结构感染有效性及安全性的随机对照试验中肥胖患者代表性不足:一项范围综述
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 20;10(3):ofad144. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad144. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
The impact of antibiotics on clinical response over time in uncomplicated cellulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素对单纯性蜂窝织炎临床疗效随时间变化的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infection. 2022 Aug;50(4):859-871. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01842-7. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review.金黄色葡萄球菌在蜂窝织炎/丹毒中的覆盖是否有必要?文献综述。
Infection. 2020 Apr;48(2):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01382-7. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas.蜂窝织炎和丹毒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD004299. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004299.pub2.
5
Skin and skin structure infections: treatment with newer generation fluoroquinolones.皮肤和皮肤结构感染:新一代氟喹诺酮类药物的治疗。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Jun;3(2):309-17. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.2.309.
6
Development of a Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) for patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Infections (ESTI).针对四肢软组织感染(ESTI)患者的健康相关生活质量问卷(HRQL)的开发。
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 11;6:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-148.
7
Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the US.加替沙星:美国治疗细菌感染的应用综述
Drugs. 2005;65(5):695-724. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565050-00007.
8
Newer treatment options for skin and soft tissue infections.皮肤和软组织感染的新型治疗选择。
Drugs. 2004;64(15):1621-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464150-00002.
9
Levofloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the United States.左氧氟沙星:美国治疗细菌感染用药综述
Drugs. 2003;63(24):2769-802. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363240-00008.
10
Are Respiratory Quinolones Useful for the Treatment of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections?呼吸喹诺酮类药物对皮肤和软组织感染的治疗是否有用?
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2003 Oct;5(5):389-390. doi: 10.1007/s11908-003-0018-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Gatifloxacin.加替沙星
Drugs. 1999 Oct;58(4):683-96; discussion 697-8. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199958040-00010.
2
The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin.大环内酯类药物:红霉素、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1999 Jun;74(6):613-34. doi: 10.4065/74.6.613.
3
Activity of gatifloxacin compared to those of five other quinolones versus aerobic and anaerobic isolates from skin and soft tissue samples of human and animal bite wound infections.加替沙星与其他五种喹诺酮类药物对人和动物咬伤伤口感染的皮肤及软组织样本中的需氧菌和厌氧菌的抗菌活性比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 Jun;43(6):1475-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1475.
4
Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997). SENTRY Study Group (North America).从皮肤和软组织感染患者中分离出的细菌病原体:来自哨兵抗菌监测项目(美国和加拿大,1997年)的发生率及抗菌药物敏感性模式。哨兵研究组(北美)
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 May;34(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00162-x.
5
The management of skin and skin structure infections in children, adolescents and adults: a review of empiric antimicrobial therapy.儿童、青少年及成人皮肤和皮肤结构感染的管理:经验性抗菌治疗综述
Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Sep;52(6):414-7.
6
Antimicrobial activity of gatifloxacin tested against 1676 strains of ciprofloxacin-resistant gram-positive cocci isolated from patient infections in North and South America.加替沙星对从北美和南美患者感染中分离出的1676株耐环丙沙星革兰氏阳性球菌的抗菌活性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;32(3):247-52. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00101-1.
7
Levofloxacin, a second-generation fluoroquinolone.左氧氟沙星,一种第二代氟喹诺酮类药物。
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Sep-Oct;18(5):915-35.
8
Activities of gatifloxacin compared to those of seven other agents against anaerobic organisms.加替沙星与其他七种药物对厌氧菌的活性比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Sep;42(9):2459-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.9.2459.
9
Antibacterial activity of gatifloxacin (AM-1155, CG5501, BMS-206584), a newly developed fluoroquinolone, against sequentially acquired quinolone-resistant mutants and the norA transformant of Staphylococcus aureus.新型氟喹诺酮类药物加替沙星(AM - 1155、CG5501、BMS - 206584)对金黄色葡萄球菌序贯获得性喹诺酮耐药突变株及norA转化株的抗菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Aug;42(8):1917-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.8.1917.
10
A multicentre, double-blind, randomised study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.一项多中心、双盲、随机研究,比较口服左氧氟沙星与环丙沙星治疗单纯性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性。
Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;52(2):69-74.

每日一次口服加替沙星与口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性皮肤及软组织感染的双盲、多中心、随机研究。

Once-daily oral gatifloxacin versus oral levofloxacin in treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections: double-blind, multicenter, randomized study.

作者信息

Tarshis G A, Miskin B M, Jones T M, Champlin J, Wingert K J, Breen J D, Brown M J

机构信息

Express Care Plus, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Aug;45(8):2358-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.8.2358-2362.2001.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.45.8.2358-2362.2001
PMID:11451697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC90654/
Abstract

This was a double-blind, multicenter study in which 410 adults (> or =18 years of age) with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were randomized to receive either 400 mg of gatifloxacin orally once daily or 500 mg of levofloxacin orally once daily for 7 to 10 days. The study protocol called for four assessments-before and during treatment, at the end of treatment, and posttreatment. Efficacy evaluations included clinical response and bacterial eradication rates. Of 407 treated patients, 202 (108 women, 94 men) received gatifloxacin and 205 (111 women, 94 men) received levofloxacin. For clinically evaluable patients, the cure rates were 91% for gatifloxacin and 84% for levofloxacin (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -2.0 to 15.2%). Clinical cure rates for microbiologically evaluable patients were 93% for gatifloxacin and 88% for levofloxacin (95% CI for the difference, -6.5 to 16.8%). The bacterial eradication rate was 92% for each group, with gatifloxacin eradicating 93% of the methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates and levofloxacin eradicating 91% of them. Both drugs were well tolerated. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate, and nausea was the most common adverse event in each treatment arm. Once-daily oral gatifloxacin (400 mg) is clinically efficacious and well tolerated compared with once-daily levofloxacin (500 mg) for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated SSTIs.

摘要

这是一项双盲、多中心研究,410名患有单纯性皮肤和软组织感染(SSTIs)的成年人(≥18岁)被随机分为两组,一组每天口服一次400mg加替沙星,另一组每天口服一次500mg左氧氟沙星,疗程为7至10天。研究方案要求进行四次评估,分别在治疗前、治疗期间、治疗结束时和治疗后。疗效评估包括临床反应和细菌清除率。在407名接受治疗的患者中,202名(108名女性,94名男性)接受了加替沙星治疗,205名(111名女性,94名男性)接受了左氧氟沙星治疗。对于可进行临床评估的患者,加替沙星的治愈率为91%,左氧氟沙星为84%(差异的95%置信区间[CI]为-2.0至15.2%)。微生物学可评估患者的临床治愈率,加替沙星为93%,左氧氟沙星为88%(差异的95%CI为-6.5至16.8%)。两组的细菌清除率均为92%,加替沙星清除了93%的甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌分离株,左氧氟沙星清除了91%。两种药物耐受性良好。大多数不良事件为轻至中度,恶心是每个治疗组中最常见的不良事件。与每天一次口服500mg左氧氟沙星相比,每天一次口服400mg加替沙星治疗单纯性SSTIs患者在临床上有效且耐受性良好。