Suppr超能文献

与口服克拉霉素相比,两种口服莫西沙星治疗方案在社区获得性肺炎治疗中的疗效和安全性。

The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Hoeffken G, Meyer H P, Winter J, Verhoef L

机构信息

University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus Medical Clinic/Pneumology, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2001 Jul;95(7):553-64. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1113.

Abstract

An international multi-centre, randomized, prospective, double-blind study compared oral moxifloxacin (200 mg or 400 mg once daily for 10 days) with oral clarithromycin (500 mg, twice daily for 10 days) in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical success rate in the evaluable population at the primary efficacy assessment, 3-5 days after the end of study treatment, was 93.9% in patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin; 94.4%, with 400 mg moxifloxacin; and 94.3%, with clarithromycin. Clinical success rates were maintained at follow-up, 21-28 days after the end of treatment: 90.7% (200 mg moxifloxacin), 92.8% (400 mg moxifloxacin) and 92.2% (clarithromycin). The 95% confidence intervals indicated that all three treatment regimens were equally effective in treating CAP. At follow-up, the 400 mg moxifloxacin dose had a slightly higher observed cure rate than the 200 mg moxifloxacin dose, but this was not statistically significant. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (42%), Haemophilus influenzae (19%), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (10%), Moraxella catarrhalis (6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5%) and Staphylococcus aureus (4%). The bacteriological success rate (eradication and presumed eradication) was 72.5% (29/40) for 200 mg moxifloxacin, 78.7% (37/47) for 400 mg moxifloxacin and 70.7% (29/41) for clarithromycin. The adverse event profile was comparable between the three treatment groups. Most adverse events, possibly or probably related to the study drug, were generally mild or moderate in severity and mostly related to the digestive system: diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain in 200 mg moxifloxacin patients; diarrhoea, liver function abnormalities and nausea in 400 mg moxifloxacin patients and liver function abnormalities, diarrhoea, nausea and taste perversion in clarithromycin patients. Study drugs were discontinued because of adverse events in 7/229 (3%) patients treated with 200 mg moxifloxacin, 11/224 (5%) with moxifloxacin 400 mg and 11/222 (5%) with clarithromycin. In all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically, and as well tolerated as clarithromycin in the treatment of CAP. Bacteriological success rates in moxifloxacin-treated patients were greater than those of clarithromycin. Moxifloxacin, given once daily, is free of many drug-drug interactions and requires no dosage adjustments in most renal hepatic deficient patients.

摘要

一项国际多中心、随机、前瞻性、双盲研究比较了口服莫西沙星(200毫克或400毫克,每日一次,共10天)与口服克拉霉素(500毫克,每日两次,共10天)治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的效果。在研究治疗结束后3至5天的主要疗效评估中,可评估人群的临床成功率为:接受200毫克莫西沙星治疗的患者为93.9%;接受400毫克莫西沙星治疗的患者为94.4%;接受克拉霉素治疗的患者为94.3%。在治疗结束后21至28天的随访中,临床成功率保持稳定:90.7%(200毫克莫西沙星)、92.8%(400毫克莫西沙星)和92.2%(克拉霉素)。95%置信区间表明,所有三种治疗方案在治疗CAP方面同样有效。在随访中,400毫克莫西沙星剂量的观察治愈率略高于200毫克莫西沙星剂量,但无统计学意义。最常分离出的病原体为肺炎链球菌(42%)、流感嗜血杆菌(19%)、副流感嗜血杆菌(10%)、卡他莫拉菌(6%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(5%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(4%)。200毫克莫西沙星的细菌学成功率(根除和假定根除)为72.5%(29/40),400毫克莫西沙星为78.7%(37/47),克拉霉素为70.7%(29/41)。三个治疗组的不良事件情况相当。大多数可能或很可能与研究药物相关的不良事件一般严重程度为轻度或中度,且大多与消化系统有关:200毫克莫西沙星治疗的患者出现腹泻、恶心和腹痛;400毫克莫西沙星治疗的患者出现腹泻、肝功能异常和恶心;克拉霉素治疗的患者出现肝功能异常、腹泻、恶心和味觉异常。在接受200毫克莫西沙星治疗的229名患者中有7名(3%)、接受400毫克莫西沙星治疗的224名患者中有11名(5%)、接受克拉霉素治疗的222名患者中有11名(5%)因不良事件而停用研究药物。在所有评估中,莫西沙星在治疗CAP方面临床疗效至少与克拉霉素相当,且耐受性良好。莫西沙星治疗患者的细菌学成功率高于克拉霉素。莫西沙星每日服用一次,无许多药物相互作用,且大多数肝肾功能不全患者无需调整剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验