Petitpretz P, Arvis P, Marel M, Moita J, Urueta J
Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital André Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1):185-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.185.
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin vs amoxicillin for treatment of mild-to-moderate, suspected pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients.
Multinational, multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.
Eighty-two centers in 20 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Hong Kong, Hungary, Lithuania, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and Uruguay).
Four hundred eleven adults (inpatients or outpatients) with suspected pneumococcal CAP.
Randomization 1:1 to moxifloxacin, 400 mg/d, or amoxicillin, 1,000 g tid, for 10 days.
Primary efficacy parameter was clinical response, 3 to 5 days after therapy (end of therapy [EOT]) in the per protocol (PP) population (362 patients). The clinical success rate in the PP population was 91.5% (moxifloxacin) and 89.7% (amoxicillin; two-sided 95% confidence interval, -4.2 to 7.8%). The clinical cure rate in patients with proven pneumococcal pneumonia was similar in both treatment groups (87.8%). The bacteriologic success rate in 136 bacteriologically evaluable patients at the EOT was 89.7% (moxifloxacin) and 82.4% (amoxicillin). The bacteriologic success rate against Streptococcus pneumoniae was 89.6% (moxifloxacin) and 84.8% (amoxicillin). The frequency of adverse events was comparable in both treatment groups. Digestive symptoms were the most common drug-related adverse events in both treatment groups.
Moxifloxacin was statistically at least as effective as high-dose amoxicillin for treatment of mild-to-moderate, suspected pneumococcal CAP. Moxifloxacin may be an alternative for empiric CAP treatment, especially in areas where multidrug resistance in S pneumoniae is sufficiently prevalent to preclude routine penicillin.
比较莫西沙星与阿莫西林治疗成年患者轻至中度疑似肺炎球菌社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的疗效和安全性。
多国、多中心、双盲、随机研究。
20个国家的82个中心(阿根廷、巴西、智利、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、爱沙尼亚、法国、中国香港、匈牙利、立陶宛、墨西哥、葡萄牙、俄罗斯、斯洛文尼亚、南非、西班牙、土耳其、乌克兰、英国和乌拉圭)。
411名疑似肺炎球菌CAP的成年患者(住院患者或门诊患者)。
按1:1随机分为莫西沙星组(400mg/d)或阿莫西林组(1000mg每日三次),疗程10天。
主要疗效参数为符合方案(PP)人群(362例患者)治疗3至5天(治疗结束[EOT])后的临床反应。PP人群的临床成功率为91.5%(莫西沙星)和89.7%(阿莫西林;双侧95%置信区间,-4.2至7.8%)。两个治疗组中确诊为肺炎球菌肺炎患者的临床治愈率相似(87.8%)。136例在EOT时可进行细菌学评估的患者中,细菌学成功率为89.7%(莫西沙星)和82.4%(阿莫西林)。针对肺炎链球菌的细菌学成功率为89.6%(莫西沙星)和84.8%(阿莫西林)。两个治疗组的不良事件发生率相当。消化症状是两个治疗组中最常见的与药物相关的不良事件。
在治疗轻至中度疑似肺炎球菌CAP方面,莫西沙星在统计学上至少与高剂量阿莫西林一样有效。莫西沙星可能是经验性治疗CAP的一种替代药物,尤其是在肺炎链球菌多重耐药性普遍存在以至于无法常规使用青霉素的地区。