• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者中,序贯静脉注射(i.v.)和口服莫西沙星与序贯静脉注射和口服阿莫西林克拉维酸钾(联合或不联合克拉霉素)的随机对照试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1746-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002.
2
An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.与静脉注射/口服阿莫西林克拉维酸联合或不联合克拉霉素相比,序贯静脉注射/口服莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的经济学评价。
Chest. 2003 Aug;124(2):526-35. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.2.526.
3
The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.与口服克拉霉素相比,两种口服莫西沙星治疗方案在社区获得性肺炎治疗中的疗效和安全性。
Respir Med. 2001 Jul;95(7):553-64. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1113.
4
Moxifloxacin monotherapy compared to amoxicillin-clavulanate plus roxithromycin for nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia in adults with risk factors.莫西沙星单药治疗与阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸加罗红霉素治疗有风险因素的成人非重症社区获得性肺炎的比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jun;24(6):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s10096-005-1347-1.
5
Once-daily oral gatifloxacin vs three-times-daily co-amoxiclav in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.每日一次口服加替沙星与每日三次口服阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的比较
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Jun;10(6):512-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00875.x.
6
Moxifloxacin monotherapy is effective in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: the MOTIV study--a randomized clinical trial.莫西沙星单药治疗对社区获得性肺炎住院患者有效:MOTIV研究——一项随机临床试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 May 15;46(10):1499-509. doi: 10.1086/587519.
7
A multinational, multicentre, non-blinded, randomized study of moxifloxacin oral tablets compared with co-amoxiclav oral tablets in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.一项关于莫西沙星口服片与阿莫西林克拉维酸口服片治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的多中心、非盲法、随机化的跨国研究。
J Int Med Res. 2001 Jul-Aug;29(4):314-28. doi: 10.1177/147323000102900408.
8
A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy versus intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections.一项比较序贯静脉/口服莫西沙星单药治疗与静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦后继以口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的疗效和安全性的随机试验。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Nov;66(11):2632-42. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr344. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
9
Randomized controlled trial of moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections.莫西沙星与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦及阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):204-11. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000230024.84190.a8.
10
SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.SOLITAIRE-IV:一项比较静脉-口服索利霉素与静脉-口服莫西沙星治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 15;63(8):1007-1016. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw490. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Respiratory Fluoroquinolones Monotherapy vs. β-Lactams With or Without Macrolides for Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia Patients: A Meta-Analysis.呼吸喹诺酮类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类联合或不联合大环内酯类治疗住院社区获得性肺炎患者的Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 8;10:489. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00489. eCollection 2019.
2
Moxifloxacin monotherapy versus combination therapy in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia evoked ARDS.莫西沙星单药治疗与联合治疗对重症社区获得性肺炎并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0376-5.
3
JAID/JSC Guidelines for the Treatment of Respiratory Infectious Diseases: The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases/Japanese Society of Chemotherapy - The JAID/JSC Guide to Clinical Management of Infectious Disease/Guideline-preparing Committee Respiratory Infectious Disease WG.日本传染病学会/日本化疗学会《呼吸道传染病治疗指南》:日本传染病学会/日本化疗学会传染病临床管理指南/指南编写委员会呼吸道传染病工作组
J Infect Chemother. 2016 Jul;22(7 Suppl):S1-S65. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.12.019. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
Enrofloxacin and macrolides alone or in combination with rifampicin as antimicrobial treatment in a bovine model of acute Chlamydia psittaci infection.恩诺沙星和大环内酯类药物单独或与利福平联合作为急性鹦鹉热衣原体感染牛模型的抗菌治疗药物。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0119736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119736. eCollection 2015.
5
Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy evaluation in empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.莫西沙星在社区获得性肺炎经验性治疗中的药代动力学特征及疗效评估
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):2398-404. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04659-14. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
Efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin in community acquired pneumonia: a prospective, multicenter, observational study (CAPRIVI).莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究(CAPRIVI)。
BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Jun 30;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-105.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in 2338 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.莫西沙星治疗 2338 例慢性支气管炎急性加重患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(1):1-10. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323010-00001.
8
Update on the cardiac safety of moxifloxacin.莫西沙星心脏安全性的最新情况。
Curr Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;7(2):149-63. doi: 10.2174/157488612802715735.
9
Are fluoroquinolones superior antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia?氟喹诺酮类药物是否优于抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎?
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Jun;14(3):317-29. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0251-y.
10
Elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia: optimal treatment strategies.老年社区获得性肺炎患者:最佳治疗策略。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Jul 1;28(7):519-37. doi: 10.2165/11591980-000000000-00000.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎抗菌治疗的进展
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1999 Apr;12(2):137-43. doi: 10.1097/00001432-199904000-00006.
2
Cost-effectiveness of gatifloxacin vs ceftriaxone with a macrolide for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.加替沙星与头孢曲松联合大环内酯类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎的成本效益分析
Chest. 2001 May;119(5):1439-48. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.5.1439.
3
Relation between length of hospital stay and costs of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎患者住院时间与护理费用之间的关系。
Am J Med. 2000 Oct 1;109(5):378-85. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00500-3.
4
Associations between initial antimicrobial therapy and medical outcomes for hospitalized elderly patients with pneumonia.住院老年肺炎患者初始抗菌治疗与医疗结局之间的关联。
Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 22;159(21):2562-72. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.21.2562.
5
A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.一项多中心随机研究,比较静脉注射和/或口服左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Sep;41(9):1965-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.9.1965.
6
Incidence of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Results of a population-based active surveillance Study in Ohio. The Community-Based Pneumonia Incidence Study Group.需住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎的发病率。俄亥俄州一项基于人群的主动监测研究结果。社区肺炎发病率研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(15):1709-18.
7
Community-acquired pneumonia: the annual cost to the National Health Service in the UK.社区获得性肺炎:英国国民医疗服务体系的年度成本
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jul;10(7):1530-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10071530.
8
A prospective randomized study of inpatient iv. antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. The optimal duration of therapy.一项关于住院患者静脉注射抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的前瞻性随机研究。最佳治疗疗程。
Chest. 1996 Oct;110(4):965-71. doi: 10.1378/chest.110.4.965.
9
Guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults admitted to hospital. The British Thoracic Society.成人社区获得性肺炎住院治疗管理指南。英国胸科学会。
Br J Hosp Med. 1993;49(5):346-50.
10
Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association.成人社区获得性肺炎初始管理指南:诊断、严重程度评估及初始抗菌治疗。美国胸科学会。美国肺脏协会医学部。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Nov;148(5):1418-26. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1418.

在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者中,序贯静脉注射(i.v.)和口服莫西沙星与序贯静脉注射和口服阿莫西林克拉维酸钾(联合或不联合克拉霉素)的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.

作者信息

Finch R, Schürmann D, Collins O, Kubin R, McGivern J, Bobbaers H, Izquierdo J L, Nikolaides P, Ogundare F, Raz R, Zuck P, Hoeffken G

机构信息

Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham. Bayer plc, Newbury, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1746-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002
PMID:12019085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC127227/
Abstract

The objective of the present trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of moxifloxacin (400 mg) given intravenously (i.v.) once daily followed by oral moxifloxacin (400 mg) for 7 to 14 days with the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of co-amoxiclav (1.2 g) administered by i.v. infusion three times a day followed by oral co-amoxiclav (625 mg) three times a day, with or without clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily (i.v. or orally), for 7 to 14 days in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral therapy. A total of 628 patients were enrolled and assessed by evaluation of their clinical and bacteriological responses 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after administration of the last dose of study medication. Although the trial was designed, on the basis of predefined outcomes, to demonstrate the equivalence of the two regimens, the results showed statistically significant higher clinical success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.4%, and for comparator regimen, 85.4%; difference [Delta], 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91 to 13.19%; P = 0.004) and bacteriological success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.7%, and for comparator regimen, 81.7%; Delta, 12.06%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 22.91%) for patients treated with moxifloxacin. This superiority was seen irrespective of the severity of the pneumonia and whether or not the combination therapy included a macrolide. The time to resolution of fever was also statistically significantly faster for patients who received moxifloxacin (median time, 2 versus 3 days), and the duration of hospital admission was approximately 1 day less for patients who received moxifloxacin. The treatment was converted to oral therapy immediately after the initial mandatory 3-day period of i.v. administration for a larger proportion of patients in the moxifloxacin group than patients in the comparator group (151 [50.2%] versus 57 [17.8%] patients). There were fewer deaths (9 [3.0%] versus 17 [5.3%]) and fewer serious adverse events (38 [12.6%] versus 53 [16.5%]) in the moxifloxacin group than in the comparator group. The rates of drug-related adverse events were comparable in both groups (38.9% in each treatment group). The overall incidence of laboratory abnormalities was similar in both groups. Thus, it is concluded that monotherapy with moxifloxacin is superior to that with a standard combination regimen of a beta-lactam and a beta-lactamase inhibitor, co-amoxiclav, with or without a macrolide, clarithromycin, in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a hospital.

摘要

本试验的目的是比较每日静脉注射(i.v.)一次莫西沙星(400mg),随后口服莫西沙星(400mg)7至14天,与每日静脉输注三次阿莫西林克拉维酸(1.2g),随后每日口服三次阿莫西林克拉维酸(625mg),联合或不联合每日两次克拉霉素(500mg)(静脉注射或口服)7至14天,在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎成年患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。共有628例患者入组,并在最后一剂研究药物给药后5至7天和21至28天通过评估其临床和细菌学反应进行评估。尽管根据预定义的结果设计该试验以证明两种治疗方案的等效性,但结果显示,接受莫西沙星治疗的患者临床成功率(莫西沙星组为93.4%,对照治疗组为85.4%;差异[Delta]为8.05%;95%置信区间[CI]为2.91%至13.19%;P = 0.004)和细菌学成功率(莫西沙星组为93.7%,对照治疗组为81.7%;Delta为12.06%;95%CI为1.21%至22.91%)在统计学上显著更高。无论肺炎的严重程度如何以及联合治疗是否包括大环内酯类药物,均观察到这种优越性。接受莫西沙星治疗的患者发热消退时间在统计学上也显著更快(中位时间为2天对3天),接受莫西沙星治疗的患者住院时间约少1天。与对照治疗组相比,莫西沙星组中更大比例的患者在最初强制性静脉给药3天后立即转为口服治疗(151例[50.2%]对57例[17.8%]患者)。莫西沙星组的死亡人数(9例[3.0%]对17例[5.3%])和严重不良事件较少(38例[