Suppr超能文献

在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者中,序贯静脉注射(i.v.)和口服莫西沙星与序贯静脉注射和口服阿莫西林克拉维酸钾(联合或不联合克拉霉素)的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous (i.v.) and oral moxifloxacin compared with sequential i.v. and oral co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral treatment.

作者信息

Finch R, Schürmann D, Collins O, Kubin R, McGivern J, Bobbaers H, Izquierdo J L, Nikolaides P, Ogundare F, Raz R, Zuck P, Hoeffken G

机构信息

Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham. Bayer plc, Newbury, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1746-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1746-1754.2002.

Abstract

The objective of the present trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of moxifloxacin (400 mg) given intravenously (i.v.) once daily followed by oral moxifloxacin (400 mg) for 7 to 14 days with the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of co-amoxiclav (1.2 g) administered by i.v. infusion three times a day followed by oral co-amoxiclav (625 mg) three times a day, with or without clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily (i.v. or orally), for 7 to 14 days in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral therapy. A total of 628 patients were enrolled and assessed by evaluation of their clinical and bacteriological responses 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after administration of the last dose of study medication. Although the trial was designed, on the basis of predefined outcomes, to demonstrate the equivalence of the two regimens, the results showed statistically significant higher clinical success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.4%, and for comparator regimen, 85.4%; difference [Delta], 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91 to 13.19%; P = 0.004) and bacteriological success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.7%, and for comparator regimen, 81.7%; Delta, 12.06%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 22.91%) for patients treated with moxifloxacin. This superiority was seen irrespective of the severity of the pneumonia and whether or not the combination therapy included a macrolide. The time to resolution of fever was also statistically significantly faster for patients who received moxifloxacin (median time, 2 versus 3 days), and the duration of hospital admission was approximately 1 day less for patients who received moxifloxacin. The treatment was converted to oral therapy immediately after the initial mandatory 3-day period of i.v. administration for a larger proportion of patients in the moxifloxacin group than patients in the comparator group (151 [50.2%] versus 57 [17.8%] patients). There were fewer deaths (9 [3.0%] versus 17 [5.3%]) and fewer serious adverse events (38 [12.6%] versus 53 [16.5%]) in the moxifloxacin group than in the comparator group. The rates of drug-related adverse events were comparable in both groups (38.9% in each treatment group). The overall incidence of laboratory abnormalities was similar in both groups. Thus, it is concluded that monotherapy with moxifloxacin is superior to that with a standard combination regimen of a beta-lactam and a beta-lactamase inhibitor, co-amoxiclav, with or without a macrolide, clarithromycin, in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a hospital.

摘要

本试验的目的是比较每日静脉注射(i.v.)一次莫西沙星(400mg),随后口服莫西沙星(400mg)7至14天,与每日静脉输注三次阿莫西林克拉维酸(1.2g),随后每日口服三次阿莫西林克拉维酸(625mg),联合或不联合每日两次克拉霉素(500mg)(静脉注射或口服)7至14天,在需要初始肠外治疗的社区获得性肺炎成年患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。共有628例患者入组,并在最后一剂研究药物给药后5至7天和21至28天通过评估其临床和细菌学反应进行评估。尽管根据预定义的结果设计该试验以证明两种治疗方案的等效性,但结果显示,接受莫西沙星治疗的患者临床成功率(莫西沙星组为93.4%,对照治疗组为85.4%;差异[Delta]为8.05%;95%置信区间[CI]为2.91%至13.19%;P = 0.004)和细菌学成功率(莫西沙星组为93.7%,对照治疗组为81.7%;Delta为12.06%;95%CI为1.21%至22.91%)在统计学上显著更高。无论肺炎的严重程度如何以及联合治疗是否包括大环内酯类药物,均观察到这种优越性。接受莫西沙星治疗的患者发热消退时间在统计学上也显著更快(中位时间为2天对3天),接受莫西沙星治疗的患者住院时间约少1天。与对照治疗组相比,莫西沙星组中更大比例的患者在最初强制性静脉给药3天后立即转为口服治疗(151例[50.2%]对57例[17.8%]患者)。莫西沙星组的死亡人数(9例[3.0%]对17例[5.3%])和严重不良事件较少(38例[

相似文献

5
Once-daily oral gatifloxacin vs three-times-daily co-amoxiclav in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Jun;10(6):512-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00875.x.

引用本文的文献

5
Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy evaluation in empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):2398-404. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04659-14. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of moxifloxacin in 2338 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(1):1-10. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323010-00001.
8
Update on the cardiac safety of moxifloxacin.
Curr Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;7(2):149-63. doi: 10.2174/157488612802715735.
9
Are fluoroquinolones superior antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia?
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Jun;14(3):317-29. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0251-y.
10
Elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia: optimal treatment strategies.
Drugs Aging. 2011 Jul 1;28(7):519-37. doi: 10.2165/11591980-000000000-00000.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1999 Apr;12(2):137-43. doi: 10.1097/00001432-199904000-00006.
3
Relation between length of hospital stay and costs of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Am J Med. 2000 Oct 1;109(5):378-85. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00500-3.
4
7
Community-acquired pneumonia: the annual cost to the National Health Service in the UK.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jul;10(7):1530-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10071530.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验