Safe periods both explain and need explaining.
作者信息
Sidman M
出版信息
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):335-8; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-335.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Safe periods both explain and need explaining.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):335-8; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-335.
2
The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-348.
3
Molar versus as a paradigm clash.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):338-41; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-338.
4
Explaining avoidance: two factors are still better than one.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):357-61; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-357.
5
Beyond the molar-molecular distinction: we need multiscaled analyses.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):342-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342.
6
Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):362-5; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-362.
7
A few minor suggestions.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):354-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-354.
8
Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):311-33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-311.
9
Are responses in avoidance procedures "safety" signals?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):351-4; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-351.
10
Flavor preferences produced by backward pairing with wheel running.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Apr;34(2):283-93. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.2.283.
Zotero 插件