Gardner-Medwin J M, Macdonald I A, Taylor J Y, Riley P H, Powell R J
Department of Rheumatology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jul;52(1):17-23. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01405.x.
Patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon (PRP) have more severe symptoms in the winter. The aetiology of this is more complex than simply increased vasoconstriction in response to the immediate ambient temperature. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in skin temperature (Tsk), microvascular blood flow and responses to endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilators in healthy controls, and women with PRP under identical environmental temperatures but in different seasons.
Ten women with PRP were compared with age matched women (10) and men (10). Finger skin responses were recorded immediately on arrival, after stabilizing in a temperature regulated laboratory at 22-24 degrees C, and at matched warm (35 degrees C) and cold (15 degrees C) Tsk in the winter and summer. Baseline red blood cell flux (r.b.c. flux), and the change in flux in response to iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were recorded by laser Doppler fluxmetry at the warm and cold Tsk.
Arrival Tsk were significantly cooler for all subjects during the winter (mean seasonal difference -2.6 degrees C, P < 0.0001), and markedly colder in subjects with PRP (mean seasonal difference -3.5 degrees C, P < 0.0005). Statistically significant seasonal differences persisted in all subjects at stable Tsk despite an identical laboratory temperature (mean difference 1.3 degrees C, P < 0.0001). To achieve comparable controlled finger Tsk a significantly colder local environment was required for male controls (mean of -2.1 degrees C, P < 0.0001), and a significantly warmer environment for subjects with PRP (mean of + 2.4 degrees C, P < 0.0001) compared with female controls. This needed to be warmer in the winter, by a mean of 2.4 degrees C, than the summer for all subjects. Vasodilatation in response to ACh, but not SNP, was significantly smaller (P < 0.0001) in the PRP group compared with the female controls for all visits, with most of this difference arising in the winter visits (P < 0.01).
There is a seasonal and persistent influence on finger Tsk, and microvascular blood flow in healthy men and women, which modifies the observed responses to immediate changes in finger Tsk. The seasonal differences are greater in women than men, and are further exaggerated in women with PRP, in whom this is associated with reduced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation.
原发性雷诺现象(PRP)患者在冬季症状更为严重。其病因比单纯因即时环境温度导致血管收缩增强更为复杂。本研究旨在调查在相同环境温度但不同季节下,健康对照者以及PRP女性患者的皮肤温度(Tsk)、微血管血流量以及对内皮依赖性和非依赖性血管扩张剂反应的差异。
将10名PRP女性患者与年龄匹配的女性(10名)和男性(10名)进行比较。在抵达后、在温度调节为22 - 24摄氏度的实验室稳定后、以及在冬季和夏季匹配的温暖(35摄氏度)和寒冷(15摄氏度)Tsk条件下,立即记录手指皮肤反应。通过激光多普勒血流仪在温暖和寒冷Tsk条件下记录基线红细胞通量(r.b.c.通量)以及对乙酰胆碱(ACh)和硝普钠(SNP)离子导入的通量变化。
在冬季,所有受试者抵达时的Tsk均显著更低(平均季节差异 -2.6摄氏度,P < 0.0001),PRP患者的Tsk更低(平均季节差异 -3.5摄氏度,P < 0.0005)。尽管实验室温度相同,但在稳定Tsk时,所有受试者的季节差异在统计学上仍显著存在(平均差异1.3摄氏度,P < 0.0001)。与女性对照相比,为使男性对照达到可比的手指Tsk控制,需要显著更低的局部环境温度(平均为 -2.1摄氏度,P < 0.0001),而PRP患者则需要显著更高的环境温度(平均为 + 2.4摄氏度,P < 0.0001)。对于所有受试者,冬季所需温度比夏季平均高2.4摄氏度。在所有访视中,与女性对照相比,PRP组对ACh而非SNP的血管舒张反应显著更小(P < 0.0001),且这种差异大部分出现在冬季访视中(P < 0.01)。
季节对手指Tsk以及健康男性和女性的微血管血流量存在持续影响,这改变了对手指Tsk即时变化的观察反应。女性的季节差异大于男性,PRP女性患者的差异进一步扩大,这与内皮依赖性血管舒张减少有关。