Webb J A, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Abdul-Manap R, Hofmann U, Mikus G, Kamali F
Wolfson Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jul;52(1):35-43. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01414.x.
It is not clear whether the analgesic effect following dihydrocodeine (DHC) administration is due to either DHC itself or its metabolite, dihydromorphine (DHM). We examined the relative contribution of DHC and DHM to analgesia following DHC administration in a group of healthy volunteers using a PK-PD link modelling approach.
A single oral dose of DHC (90 mg) was administered to 10 healthy volunteers in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A computerized cold pressor test (CPT) was used to measure analgesia. On each study day, the volunteers performed the CPT before study medication and at 1.25, 2.75, 4.25 and 5.75 h postdose. Blood samples were taken at 0.25 h (predose) and then at half hourly intervals for 5.75 h postdose. PK-PD link modelling was used to describe the relationships between DHC, DHM and analgesic effect.
Mean pain AUCs following DHC administration were significantly different to those following placebo administration (P = 0.001). Mean pain AUC changes were 91 score x s(-1) for DHC and -17 score x s(-1) for placebo (95% CI = +/- 36.5 for both treatments). The assumption of a simple linear relationship between DHC concentration and effect provided a significantly better fit than the model containing DHM as the active moiety (AIC = 4.431 vs 4.668, respectively). The more complex models did not improve the likelihood of model fits significantly.
The findings suggest that the analgesic effect following DHC ingestion is mainly attributed to the parent drug rather than its DHM metabolite. It can thus be inferred that polymorphic differences in DHC metabolism to DHM have little or no effect on the analgesic affect.
尚不清楚服用二氢可待因(DHC)后的镇痛效果是归因于DHC本身还是其代谢产物二氢吗啡(DHM)。我们采用药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)链接建模方法,在一组健康志愿者中研究了DHC和DHM在服用DHC后镇痛作用中的相对贡献。
在一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,对10名健康志愿者单次口服给予DHC(90毫克)。使用计算机化冷加压试验(CPT)测量镇痛效果。在每个研究日,志愿者在服用研究药物前以及服药后1.25、2.75、4.25和5.75小时进行CPT。在0.25小时(服药前)采集血样,然后在服药后5.75小时每隔半小时采集一次血样。采用PK-PD链接建模来描述DHC、DHM与镇痛效果之间的关系。
服用DHC后的平均疼痛曲线下面积(AUC)与服用安慰剂后的平均疼痛AUC有显著差异(P = 0.001)。DHC的平均疼痛AUC变化为91分×秒⁻¹,安慰剂为-17分×秒⁻¹(两种治疗的95%置信区间均为±36.5)。假设DHC浓度与效应之间存在简单线性关系,其拟合效果明显优于以DHM为活性部分的模型(分别为AIC = 4.431和4.668)。更复杂的模型并未显著提高模型拟合的可能性。
研究结果表明,摄入DHC后的镇痛效果主要归因于母体药物而非其DHM代谢产物。因此可以推断,DHC代谢为DHM的多态性差异对镇痛效果几乎没有影响。