Fowler S J, Orr L C, Wilson A M, Sims E J, Lipworth B J
Asthma and Allergy Research Group, Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jul;52(1):93-5. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.bjcp.1399.x.
With the recent introduction of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalers it is important to know the relative systemic safety profiles of inhaled corticosteroids. We therefore decided to compare systemic bioavailability of HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) vs HFA-fluticasone propionate (FP).
Sixteen healthy volunteers were randomised in placebo-controlled single blind cross-over fashion to receive 3 weeks with HFA-FP or HFA-BDP, given as 1 week cumulative doubling doses (nominal ex-valve) of 500, 1000 and 2000 microg day(-1), with a 1 week placebo run-in and wash-out. Overnight (22.00 h to 08.00 h) and early morning (08.00 h) urinary cortisol/creatinine excretion and 08.00 h serum cortisol were measured after each placebo and dosing period. All data were log-transformed to normalize their distribution.
Urine and serum cortisol were suppressed by 2000 microg FP and BDP vs placebo and by 1000 microg BDP vs placebo for urinary cortisol/creatinine (P < 0.05). Overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio (the primary endpoint) was suppressed more by 1000 microg BDP vs 1000 microg FP (P < 0.05), amounting to a geometric mean fold difference (95% CI) of 1.64 (1.04-2.56). There were also more individual low values less than 3 nmol mmol(-1) with BDP than FP at 1000 microg: n = 8/16 vs n = 2/16 (P < 0.05).
There was dose-related suppression of corrected urinary cortisol/creatinine with the HFA formulations of BDP and FP. Suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine ratio was significantly greater with HFA-BDP than HFA-FP at 1000 microg. This suggests that the greater glucocorticoid potency of HFA-FP may be offset by the greater lung bioavailability of HFA-BDP.
随着氢氟烷烃(HFA)吸入器的近期引入,了解吸入性糖皮质激素的相对全身安全性概况很重要。因此,我们决定比较丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)与丙酸氟替卡松(FP)的全身生物利用度。
16名健康志愿者以安慰剂对照单盲交叉方式随机分组,接受3周的HFA-FP或HFA-BDP治疗,给予500、1000和2000微克/天(标称阀外)的1周累积加倍剂量,有1周的安慰剂导入期和洗脱期。在每个安慰剂期和给药期后,测量过夜(22:00至08:00)和清晨(08:00)的尿皮质醇/肌酐排泄量以及08:00的血清皮质醇。所有数据进行对数转换以使其分布标准化。
与安慰剂相比,2000微克的FP和BDP以及1000微克的BDP对尿皮质醇/肌酐的抑制作用使尿和血清皮质醇降低(P<0.05)。过夜尿皮质醇/肌酐比值(主要终点)在1000微克时,BDP比FP的抑制作用更强(P<0.05),几何平均倍数差异(95%CI)为1.64(1.04 - 2.56)。在1000微克时,BDP组低于3纳摩尔/毫摩尔(-1)的个体低值也比FP组更多:n = 8/16 对 n = 2/16(P<0.05)。
BDP和FP的HFA制剂对校正后的尿皮质醇/肌酐有剂量相关的抑制作用。在1000微克时,HFA-BDP对过夜尿皮质醇/肌酐比值的抑制作用明显大于HFA-FP。这表明HFA-FP较高的糖皮质激素效力可能被HFA-BDP较高的肺部生物利用度所抵消。