Suppr超能文献

丙酸倍氯米松超细气雾剂(800微克/天)与丙酸氟替卡松(1000微克/天)治疗哮喘患者的疗效比较

Efficacy of HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate extra-fine aerosol (800 microg day(-1)) versus HFA-fluticasone propionate (1000 microg day(-1)) in patients with asthma.

作者信息

Aubier M, Wettenger R, Gans S J

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, H pital Bichat, Paris, France.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2001 Mar;95(3):212-20. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.1025.

Abstract

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extra-fine aerosol and HFA-fluticasone propionate (HFA-FP) are chlorofluorocarbon-free inhalers. We conducted an 8-week, open study to demonstrate the equivalence of HFA-BDP (800 microg day(-1)) and HFA-FP (1000 microg day(-1)) in moderate to severe asthma. Symptomatic patients on 500-1000 microg day(-1) CFC-BDP (or equivalent) and short-acting beta-agonist, were randomized to HFA-BDP (n = 101) or HFA-FP (n = 97) after 7-14 (+/-2) day run-in. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 198), both treatments provided clinically and statistically significant improvements in asthma control, with increases in peak expiratory flow in the morning (AM PEF) and asthma symptoms (within treatment analysis P<0.05). Mean (SE) change in AM PEF from baseline at week 8 was equivalent (defined as 90% CI for the mean difference between treatments within +/-25 l min(-1)) in the two groups: 29.59 (5.19) l min(-1) for HFA-BDP vs. 17.3 (5.45) l min(-1) for HFA-FP (90% CI-0.02, 24.91). For the perprotocol population (n = 121), the mean (SE) change in AM PEF from baseline was not equivalent; AM PEF improved to a significantly greater extent in the HFA-BDP group than HFA-FP group [34.84 (7.08) vs. 20.63 (7.32) l min(-1) P<0.01; 90% CI; 2.66, 31.10]. At week 8 in the ITT population, there were no statistically significant differences in FEV1, beta-agonist use, asthma symptom/sleep disturbance scores, or percentage of days without asthma symptoms/sleep disturbance. There was a significantly greater reduction from baseline in mean eosinophil count for HFA-BDP compared with HFA-FP at weeks 3 and 8 (P<0.01), and eosinophil cationic protein value at week 8 (P<0.01). Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no statistically significant differences in urinary cortisol creatinine parameters. In conclusion, this study showed that, in patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic asthma, HFA-BDP extra-fine aerosol 800 microg(-1) was at least as effective and equally well tolerated as 1000 microg day(-1) HFA-FP.

摘要

氢氟烷烃 - 134a倍氯米松二丙酸酯(HFA - BDP)超细气雾剂和氢氟烷烃 - 氟替卡松丙酸酯(HFA - FP)是不含氯氟烃的吸入器。我们进行了一项为期8周的开放性研究,以证明HFA - BDP(800微克/天)和HFA - FP(1000微克/天)在中重度哮喘治疗中的等效性。症状性患者每日使用500 - 1000微克的氯氟烃 - BDP(或等效药物)和短效β - 激动剂,在7 - 14(±2)天的导入期后,随机分为HFA - BDP组(n = 101)或HFA - FP组(n = 97)。在意向性治疗(ITT)人群(n = 198)中,两种治疗方法在哮喘控制方面均提供了具有临床意义和统计学意义的改善,早晨呼气峰值流速(AM PEF)增加,哮喘症状改善(组内分析P<0.05)。两组在第8周时AM PEF相对于基线的平均(SE)变化相当(定义为治疗组间平均差异的90%置信区间在±25升/分钟以内):HFA - BDP组为29.59(5.19)升/分钟,HFA - FP组为17.3(5.45)升/分钟(90%置信区间 - 0.02, 24.91)。对于符合方案人群(n = 121),AM PEF相对于基线的平均(SE)变化不相当;HFA - BDP组的AM PEF改善程度明显大于HFA - FP组[34.84(7.08)对20.63(7.32)升/分钟,P<0.01;90%置信区间;2.66, 31.10]。在ITT人群的第8周时,第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、β - 激动剂使用情况、哮喘症状/睡眠障碍评分或无哮喘症状/睡眠障碍天数的百分比方面均无统计学显著差异。与HFA - FP相比,HFA - BDP在第3周和第8周时平均嗜酸性粒细胞计数相对于基线的降低幅度显著更大(P<0.01),在第8周时嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白值也显著降低(P<0.01)。两种治疗方法耐受性良好,尿皮质醇肌酐参数无统计学显著差异。总之,本研究表明,在中重度症状性哮喘患者中,800微克/天的HFA - BDP超细气雾剂至少与1000微克/天的HFA - FP一样有效且耐受性相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验