Suppr超能文献

丹麦放牧绵羊驱虫策略的比较

Comparison of worm control strategies in grazing sheep in Denmark.

作者信息

Boa M E, Thamsborg S M, Kassuku A A, Bøgh H O

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Microbiology & Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.

出版信息

Acta Vet Scand. 2001;42(1):57-69. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-42-57.

Abstract

Control of nematode parasites with reduced reliance on the use of anthelmintics was studied in 16 ewes with suckling twin lambs on contaminated pasture in Denmark. Ewes and lambs were treated with albendazole at turn-out 3 May. Ewes were removed from the groups on 26 July, and lambs were slaughtered on 11 October. The animals were allocated to 4 groups of 8 lambs and their 4 ewes. Group TS was treated with albendazole at weeks 3, 6 and 8 after turnout and set-stocked; group TM was similarly treated but moved to clean pasture in conjunction with the last drenching; group US was untreated and set-stocked, and group UM was left untreated but moved to clean pasture week 8 after turn-out. Supplementary feed was offered in June and August due to scarcity of pasture. Strategic treatments of ewes and lambs weeks 3, 6 and 8 after turn-out, with or without a move to clean pasture, were highly effective in controlling nematode infections for most of the season. This was reflected in better weight gains and carcass characteristics in the treated compared to untreated lambs, resulting in an average increase in the value of the product by 36%. The effect of moving without treatment (UM) on faecal egg counts was limited but peak pasture infectivity was reduced to less than 10% compared to the set-stocked group and weight gains of lambs were significantly better despite poor feed availability in late season. The study showed that under set-stocked conditions repeated anthelmintic treatments of both ewes and lambs in early season may ensure sufficient nematode control whereas moving animals to clean pasture without dosing was less efficient. The latter may, however, still be a viable option in organic and other production systems where routine use of anthelmintics is banned, particularly if weaning and moving are combined or a second move is performed.

摘要

在丹麦受污染牧场上,对16只带哺乳双羔的母羊进行了减少对抗蠕虫药依赖来控制线虫寄生虫的研究。母羊和羔羊于5月3日放牧时用阿苯达唑进行了治疗。母羊于7月26日从各群组中移出,羔羊于10月11日屠宰。这些动物被分为4组,每组有8只羔羊及其4只母羊。TS组在放牧后第3、6和8周用阿苯达唑治疗并进行围栏放牧;TM组同样接受治疗,但在最后一次灌药时转移到干净牧场;US组未治疗并进行围栏放牧,UM组未治疗,但在放牧后第8周转移到干净牧场。由于牧场草料稀缺,在6月和8月提供了补充饲料。在放牧后第3、6和8周对母羊和羔羊进行策略性治疗,无论是否转移到干净牧场,在该季节的大部分时间里对线虫感染的控制都非常有效。这体现在与未治疗的羔羊相比,治疗后的羔羊体重增加和胴体特征更好,产品价值平均提高了36%。未治疗而转移(UM组)对粪蛋计数的影响有限,但与围栏放牧组相比,牧场感染高峰期降低到了不到10%,尽管后期饲料供应不足,但羔羊的体重增加明显更好。该研究表明,在围栏放牧条件下,在季节早期对母羊和羔羊重复进行驱虫治疗可确保对线虫的充分控制,而不进行给药将动物转移到干净牧场的效果较差。然而,在禁止常规使用驱虫药的有机和其他生产系统中,后者可能仍然是一个可行的选择,特别是如果断奶和转移相结合或进行第二次转移。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验