• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Angiographic analysis of immediate and long-term results of PTCR vs. PTCA in complex lesions (COBRA study).

作者信息

Dietz U, Rupprecht H J, Ekinci O, Dill T, Erbel R, Kuck K H, Abdollahnia R, Rippin G, Meyer J, Hamm C

机构信息

University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Jul;53(3):359-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1181.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.1181
PMID:11458414
Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare immediate and long-term effects of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and high-frequency rotational atherectomy (PTCR) in patients with angiographically predefined complex coronary artery lesions (AHA type B2 and C). The relation of lesion characteristics to procedural results is reported in this angiographic analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to balloon angioplasty (n = 250 patients) or rotational atherectomy (n = 252 patients). Quantitative coronary angiography could be performed in 447 patients to evaluate immediate results and in 293 patients with a 6-month angiographic follow-up. Procedural success was comparable in the PTCR and in the PTCA group (80% vs. 76%, P = 0.260). The need for stent implantation due to a residual stenosis >50% or a bail-out situation was significantly higher in the PTCA group (9.7% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.001). In both treatment groups, diameter stenosis was effectively reduced and MLD increased. The acute gain did not differ between the two groups. At 6-month control, the restenosis rate was comparable in the PTCR and in the PTCA group (37% vs. 35%, P = 0.658), whereas diameter stenosis was significantly more severe in the PTCR group than in the PTCA group (52% vs. 46%, P = 0.039) and, correspondingly, the MLD was significantly smaller in the PTCR group (1.29 mm vs. 1.44 mm, P = 0.031). Late loss was about the same in both groups, however, net gain and net gain index were significantly higher in the PTCA group (0.82 mm vs. 0.64 mm, P = 0.008; and 31% vs. 24%, P = 0.009). Analysis of procedural results for various lesion characteristics revealed no significant difference between treatment groups. In this randomized trial, complex coronary artery lesions were treated with comparable results for angiographic and procedural success and the restenosis rate by both, PTCA and PTCR. Late loss, however, was significantly higher and net gain significantly smaller after PTCR. Stents, although infrequently used, had a relevant impact on immediate PTCA results but not on late results. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:359-367.

摘要

相似文献

1
Angiographic analysis of immediate and long-term results of PTCR vs. PTCA in complex lesions (COBRA study).
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001 Jul;53(3):359-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1181.
2
Angiographic analysis of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST).血管成形术与旋磨术治疗弥漫性支架内再狭窄试验(ARTIST)的血管造影分析
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Oct 15;90(8):843-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02705-4.
3
A randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy in complex coronary lesions (COBRA study).复杂冠状动脉病变中球囊血管成形术与旋磨术的随机对照研究(COBRA研究)
Eur Heart J. 2000 Nov;21(21):1759-66. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2242.
4
Latin American randomized trial of balloon angioplasty vs coronary stenting for small vessels (LASMAL): immediate and long-term results.拉丁美洲小血管球囊血管成形术与冠状动脉支架置入术的随机试验(LASMAL):即刻及长期结果
Am J Med. 2005 Jul;118(7):743-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.03.030.
5
[Rotational atherectomy and PTCA in complex coronary lesions (B2 and C): the immediate and long-term results].[复杂冠状动脉病变(B2和C型)的旋磨术与经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术:近期及长期结果]
G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Sep;25(9):1127-38.
6
Randomized trial of conventional balloon angioplasty versus cutting balloon for in-stent restenosis. Acute and 24-hour angiographic and intravascular ultrasound changes and long-term follow-up.传统球囊血管成形术与切割球囊治疗支架内再狭窄的随机试验。急性和24小时血管造影及血管内超声变化与长期随访。
Ital Heart J. 2004 Apr;5(4):271-9.
7
Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results.冠状动脉球囊血管成形术联合临时支架置入与直接支架置入的最佳选择(OCBAS):即时及长期随访结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov;32(5):1351-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00388-x.
8
Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST).旋磨术不能降低支架内再狭窄的复发率:血管成形术与旋磨术治疗弥漫性支架内再狭窄试验(ARTIST)的结果。
Circulation. 2002 Feb 5;105(5):583-8. doi: 10.1161/hc0502.103347.
9
A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery.左前降支冠状动脉病变定向旋切术与球囊血管成形术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 22;329(4):228-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307223290402.
10
FX minirail balloon angioplasty for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison of 6 months' outcome with conventional balloon angioplasty.FX 微导管球囊血管成形术治疗支架内再狭窄患者:与传统球囊血管成形术6个月疗效的匹配对照研究
Heart Vessels. 2004 Sep;19(5):230-6. doi: 10.1007/s00380-004-0773-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid rotablation and drug-eluting balloon strategy.杂交旋磨与药物球囊策略。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021;32(1):28-32. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-050. Epub 2020 Nov 12.