• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蓄意自伤患者的心理社会与药物治疗:评估疗效所涉及的方法学问题

Psychosocial and pharmacological treatment of patients following deliberate self-harm: the methodological issues involved in evaluating effectiveness.

作者信息

Arensman E, Townsend E, Hawton K, Bremner S, Feldman E, Goldney R, Gunnell D, Hazell P, Van Heeringen K, House A, Owens D, Sakinofsky I, Träskman-Bendz L

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001 Summer;31(2):169-80. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.2.169.21516.

DOI:10.1521/suli.31.2.169.21516
PMID:11459249
Abstract

Development of effective treatments for patients following deliberate self-harm (self-poisoning or self-injury) is a very important element in suicide prevention. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the mainstay of evaluation of treatments. In a systematic review of the literature, the effectiveness of treatments based on RCTs was examined and the quality of the RCTs was assessed. Twenty trials were identified, and where possible, these were grouped on the basis of similarities among the types of treatment. In this paper, we examine the methodological aspects of the trials and consider what may be learned that will assist in the design of future studies in this field. The methodological quality of the trials was reasonable, but most trials included too few participants to detect clinically important differences in rates of repeated self-harm. In planning future trials, the following major issues should be addressed: investigators should perform power calculations to determine the number of subjects necessary to detect clinically important effects, provide information on method of randomization and interventions, use standard measures of outcome, and focus on homogeneous subgroups of patients. Improving the methodology of future studies in this field will be essential if sound evidence is to be obtained which can inform effective service provision for deliberate self-harm patients.

摘要

为蓄意自伤(自我中毒或自我伤害)患者开发有效的治疗方法是自杀预防中非常重要的一环。随机对照试验(RCT)是治疗评估的主要手段。在一项文献系统综述中,对基于随机对照试验的治疗效果进行了检查,并对随机对照试验的质量进行了评估。共识别出20项试验,并在可能的情况下,根据治疗类型的相似性对这些试验进行了分组。在本文中,我们研究了试验的方法学方面,并思考可以从中吸取哪些经验教训,以帮助设计该领域未来的研究。试验的方法学质量是合理的,但大多数试验纳入的参与者太少,无法检测出重复自伤率临床上的重要差异。在规划未来的试验时,应解决以下主要问题:研究人员应进行功效计算,以确定检测临床上重要效果所需的受试者数量,提供随机化方法和干预措施的信息,使用标准的结局测量方法,并关注患者的同质亚组。如果要获得可靠的证据,为蓄意自伤患者提供有效的服务,改进该领域未来研究的方法学将至关重要。

相似文献

1
Psychosocial and pharmacological treatment of patients following deliberate self-harm: the methodological issues involved in evaluating effectiveness.蓄意自伤患者的心理社会与药物治疗:评估疗效所涉及的方法学问题
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001 Summer;31(2):169-80. doi: 10.1521/suli.31.2.169.21516.
2
Psychosocial Interventions for People Who Self-Harm: Methodological Issues Involved in Trials to Evaluate Effectiveness.自伤人群的心理社会干预:评估疗效试验中涉及的方法学问题。
Arch Suicide Res. 2020;24(sup2):S32-S93. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2019.1592043. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Predictors of outcome following brief psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy for deliberate self-poisoning.针对蓄意自我中毒的简短心理动力人际治疗后的预后预测因素。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;37(5):532-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01197.x.
4
Practitioner review: Self-harm in adolescents.从业者综述:青少年自伤。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;53(4):337-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02525.x.
5
[Deliberate self-harm].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Nov 4;124(21):2734.
6
"Near-fatal" deliberate self-harm: characteristics, prevention and implications for the prevention of suicide.“近乎致命”的蓄意自我伤害:特征、预防及对自杀预防的启示
J Affect Disord. 2004 Apr;79(1-3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00391-9.
7
Postcards in Persia: A Twelve to Twenty-four Month Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Hospital-Treated Deliberate Self-Poisoning.波斯的明信片:一项针对医院治疗的蓄意自我中毒的随机对照试验的12至24个月随访
Arch Suicide Res. 2017 Jan 2;21(1):138-154. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1004473. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
A prospective study of repetition of self-harm following deliberate self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka.一项关于在斯里兰卡农村地区故意自我中毒后重复自我伤害的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 12;14(2):e0199486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199486. eCollection 2019.
9
A systematic review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions for youth.青少年心理社会自杀预防干预措施的系统评价。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 May;25(5):467-82. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0783-4. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
10
Psychosocial versus pharmacological treatments for deliberate self harm.针对蓄意自伤的心理社会治疗与药物治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001764.

引用本文的文献

1
What Works in Youth Suicide Prevention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.青少年自杀预防中哪些措施有效?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2018 Oct 28;4-5:52-91. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.10.004. eCollection 2018 Oct-Nov.
2
Development of an Intervention for Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Young Adults: An Open Pilot Trial.针对青年非自杀性自伤的干预措施开发:一项开放性试点试验。
Cogn Behav Pract. 2015 Nov;22(4):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.05.003.
3
A Novel Therapy for People Who Attempt Suicide and Why We Need New Models of Suicide.
一种针对自杀未遂者的新型疗法以及我们为何需要新的自杀模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 1;14(3):243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030243.
4
Effective psychological and psychosocial approaches to reduce repetition of self-harm: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.减少自我伤害重复行为的有效心理和社会心理方法:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 22;6(9):e011024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011024.
5
Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults.针对成年人自我伤害行为的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 12;2016(5):CD012189. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012189.
6
A Novel Brief Therapy for Patients Who Attempt Suicide: A 24-months Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Study of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP).一种针对自杀未遂患者的新型简短疗法:自杀未遂短期干预项目(ASSIP)的24个月随访随机对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 1;13(3):e1001968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001968. eCollection 2016 Mar.
7
Effect of Systematic Follow-Up by General Practitioners after Deliberate Self-Poisoning: A Randomised Controlled Trial.全科医生对蓄意自我中毒患者进行系统随访的效果:一项随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 2;10(12):e0143934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143934. eCollection 2015.
8
Structured follow-up by general practitioners after deliberate self-poisoning: a randomised controlled trial.全科医生对蓄意自我中毒患者的结构化随访:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:245. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0635-2.
9
Treating nonsuicidal self-injury: a systematic review of psychological and pharmacological interventions.治疗非自杀性自伤行为:心理和药物干预的系统评价
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;59(11):576-85. doi: 10.1177/070674371405901103.
10
Participation bias among suicidal adults in a randomized controlled trial.随机对照试验中自杀成年人的参与偏倚。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011 Apr;41(2):203-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2010.00011.x. Epub 2011 Feb 2.