Finco D R, Braselton W E, Cooper T A
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Georgia, Athens 30602-7389, USA.
J Vet Intern Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;15(4):368-73.
The objective of this study was to determine if plasma iohexol clearance, computed by a 1-compartment model defined by 3 plasma samples. was an accurate measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in dogs. Twenty-two adult Beagle dogs of both genders were studied. Ten dogs had intact kidneys, and 12 dogs had surgically reduced renal mass. A bolus injection of iohexol was made, and blood was obtained for plasma iohexol assay after 120, 180, and 240 minutes. Plasma was analyzed for iohexol concentration by means of 3 assay methods: chemical, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP). Urinary clearance of exogenous creatinine was used to measure GFR for three 30-minute periods occurring between 150 and 240 minutes after iohexol injection. Plasma clearance of iohexol and renal clearance of creatinine were compared by linear regression analysis and by limits of agreement techniques. Plasma iohexol clearance and urinary exogenous creatinine clearance were significantly correlated (chemical R2 = .90; HPLC R2 = .96; and ICP R2 = .96). The 1-compartment iohexol clearance:exogenous creatinine clearance ratios were 1.04 +/- 0.17, 1.05 +/- 0.14, and 1.10 +/- 0.15 for the chemical, HPLC, and ICP methods of assay, respectively, indicating that plasma iohexol clearance slightly overestimated GFR. Assuming a +/- 2 standard deviation interval for error, corrected plasma iohexol clearance measured GFR with +/-34% accuracy for the chemical, +/-26% accuracy for the HPLC, and +/-27% accuracy for the ICP method. These results indicate that plasma iohexol clearance should have utility for detection of renal dysfunction earlier in the course of progressive renal disease than is possible with measurement of plasma creatinine or urea concentrations.
本研究的目的是确定通过由3份血浆样本定义的单室模型计算的血浆碘海醇清除率是否是犬肾小球滤过率(GFR)的准确测量指标。对22只成年雌雄比格犬进行了研究。10只犬肾脏完整,12只犬经手术减少了肾质量。静脉推注碘海醇,在120、180和240分钟后采集血液用于血浆碘海醇测定。采用3种测定方法分析血浆碘海醇浓度:化学法、高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP)。在碘海醇注射后150至240分钟之间的3个30分钟时间段内,使用外源性肌酐的尿清除率来测量GFR。通过线性回归分析和一致性界限技术比较碘海醇的血浆清除率和肌酐的肾清除率。血浆碘海醇清除率与尿外源性肌酐清除率显著相关(化学法R2 = 0.90;HPLC法R2 = 0.96;ICP法R2 = 0.96)。化学法、HPLC法和ICP法测定的单室碘海醇清除率与外源性肌酐清除率之比分别为1.04±0.17、1.05±0.14和1.10±0.15,表明血浆碘海醇清除率略微高估了GFR。假设误差的±2标准差区间,化学法校正后的血浆碘海醇清除率测量GFR的准确度为±34%,HPLC法为±26%,ICP法为±27%。这些结果表明,与测量血浆肌酐或尿素浓度相比,血浆碘海醇清除率在进行性肾脏疾病过程中更早检测肾功能障碍方面应具有实用性。