Reichhart G J, Cody W J, Borkowski J G
Am J Ment Defic. 1975 May;79(6):648-58.
Forty-four retarded adolescents varying in MA, IQ, and etiology were taught one of three active rehearsal strategies or assigned to a control condition. Immediate, short-term (1 day), and long-term (2 weeks) transfer of the strategy was assessed by presenting new 9-item serial lists on each day. Exposure durations, which indicated the rate of subject-pacing, showed that the two highest MA-IQ (mean IQ = 55) groups, one diagnosed as organically impaired and the other as cultural-familially retarded, successfully transferred their strategies over three sessions, while no transfer occurred in the lower MA-IQ group (mean IQ = 40). Greater consistency in the expected pattern of exposure durations of high MA-IQ subjects was found in the cumulative-rehearsal group than in the cumulative-clustering group across sessions. During immediate transfer, the best recall was found for the cumulative group, while on short-term transfer both the cumulative and the cumulative-clustering groups learned more rapidly than the clustering or control groups. No significant recall differences during long-term transfer were apparent for high MA-IQ subjects, probably due to a ceiling effect. For retarded individuals with IQs above 50, the cumulative-rehearsal strategy was the most efficient technique for inducing strategy transfer to a categorized serial list.
44名在心理年龄、智商和病因方面各不相同的智障青少年被教授三种主动复述策略之一,或被分配到一个控制组。通过在每天呈现新的9项系列列表来评估该策略的即时、短期(1天)和长期(2周)迁移情况。表明被试自我节奏速率的暴露时长显示,两个最高心理年龄-智商(平均智商=55)组,一组被诊断为器质性损伤,另一组被诊断为文化-家族性智障,在三个阶段成功迁移了他们的策略,而低心理年龄-智商组(平均智商=40)没有发生迁移。在各阶段中,累积复述组中高心理年龄-智商被试的预期暴露时长模式比累积聚类组更具一致性。在即时迁移期间,累积组的回忆效果最佳,而在短期迁移中,累积组和累积聚类组都比聚类组或控制组学得更快。对于高心理年龄-智商被试,长期迁移期间没有明显的回忆差异,这可能是由于天花板效应。对于智商高于50的智障个体,累积复述策略是将策略迁移到分类系列列表的最有效技术。