Dorry G W, Zeaman D
Am J Ment Defic. 1975 May;79(6):711-6.
Four equated groups of moderately retarded children were trained on a simple eight-word vocabulary, each under a different experimental condition. In the standard condition a printed work was repeatedly paired with a pictured representation. In the faded condition the same procedure was used except that the picture was gradually faded-out over trials. A mixed condition had, on alternate trials, either work-and-picture or word alone, while on alternate trials a control condition had either picture alone or word alone. On immediate and delayed tests of vocabulary learning, subject showed large differences in reading performance with these methods. The order of efficiency of conditions was faded, mixed, standard, and control. Several theoretical interpretations of the superiority of fading were considered. The conclusion favored was that the fading procedure was best because it increased the attention-value of the words in relation to the faded pictures, without sacrificing the superior associative effects of noncontingent pairings of words and pictures.
四组智力中度迟钝的儿童被训练掌握一个简单的由八个单词组成的词汇表,每组处于不同的实验条件下。在标准条件下,一个印刷单词与一幅图片反复配对呈现。在消退条件下,采用相同的程序,但图片在多次试验中逐渐消退。在混合条件下,交替试验中既有单词和图片配对,也有单独呈现单词,而在交替试验的对照条件下,既有单独呈现图片,也有单独呈现单词。在词汇学习的即时和延迟测试中,使用这些方法时,受试者在阅读表现上显示出很大差异。条件效率的顺序为消退、混合、标准和对照。考虑了对消退优越性的几种理论解释。得出的结论是,消退程序是最好的,因为它提高了单词相对于消退图片的注意力价值,同时又不牺牲单词和图片非偶然配对的优越联想效果。