Suppr超能文献

无错误辨别和图片消退作为向全盲学生教授视觉词的技术。

Errorless discrimination and picture fading as techniques for teaching sight words to TMR students.

作者信息

Walsh B F, Lamberts F

出版信息

Am J Ment Defic. 1979 Mar;83(5):473-9.

PMID:426007
Abstract

The effectiveness of two approaches for teaching beginning sight words to 30 TMR students was compared. In Dorry and Zeaman's picture-fading technique, words are taught through association with pictures that are faded out over a series of trials, while in the Edmark program errorless-discrimination technique, words are taught through shaped sequences of visual and auditory--visual matching-to-sample, with the target word first appearing alone and eventually appearing with orthographically similar words. Students were instructed on two lists of 10 words each, one list in the picture-fading and one in the discrimination method, in a double counter-balanced, repeated-measures design. Covariance analysis on three measures (word identification, word recognition, and picture--word matching) showed highly significant differences between the two methods. Students' performance was better after instruction with the errorless-discrimination method than after instruction with the picture-fading method. The findings on picture fading were interpreted as indicating a possible failure of the shifting of control from picture to printed word that earlier researchers have hypothesized as occurring.

摘要

比较了两种向30名重度语言和言语障碍(TMR)学生教授初始视觉词的方法的有效性。在多里和齐曼的图片消退技术中,通过与在一系列试验中逐渐消退的图片关联来教授单词,而在埃德马克程序的无错误辨别技术中,通过视觉和听觉——视觉样本匹配的成形序列来教授单词,目标词首先单独出现,最终与正字法相似的单词一起出现。在双平衡重复测量设计中,学生们分别按照两种方法学习两组各10个单词的列表,一种方法是图片消退法,另一种是辨别法。对三项指标(单词识别、单词辨认和图片——单词匹配)的协方差分析显示,两种方法之间存在高度显著差异。与图片消退法教学后相比,学生在无错误辨别法教学后的表现更好。关于图片消退的研究结果被解释为表明早期研究人员假设的从图片到印刷单词的控制转移可能失败。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验