Ryan E A, Nguyen G
Diabetes Outpatient Clinic, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001 Spring;3(1):91-7. doi: 10.1089/152091501750220055.
Glucose monitoring is essential for the successful management of gestational diabetes. The accuracy of glucose meters is typically determined over a much wider range of glucose values than that commonly encountered in gestational diabetes. The objective of our study was to look at the accuracy of self-monitoring glucose meters in a clinic setting over a range of glucose values seen in gestational diabetes. We retrospectively analyzed 107 case records of subjects with gestational diabetes, each of whom had three simultaneous laboratory and glucose meter glucose tests. The results were compared using the performance goals that (1) all of glucose meters should have readings within 10% of the reference value and (2) the error grid analysis in the standard format and a modified version suitable for gestational diabetes. We also examined the range of the differences from the reference value. Nearly half of the values (47%) were in excess of 10% of the reference range (either above or below). Close to 15% were in excess of 20% difference from the reference range. Standard error grid analysis showed that 96% of the values fell within sections A of the error grid which are considered acceptable, and 100% fell within sections A and B, differences which are generally considered to have no major impact on care. The modified version of the error grid analysis demonstrated that 39% of the values were outside the acceptable range. Within subjects, a substantial number (26%) had a range of differences that exceeded 20% difference between each other. Although the meters give reasonable results that might be acceptable for general diabetes care, the results provide some cause for concern in the management of gestational diabetes. Given the need for precision in the setting of pregnancy particularly in making the decision of whether to start or withhold insulin therapy, caregivers need to be cognizant of these inaccuracies.
血糖监测对于成功管理妊娠期糖尿病至关重要。血糖仪的准确性通常是在比妊娠期糖尿病常见范围更广泛的血糖值范围内确定的。我们研究的目的是观察在临床环境中,针对妊娠期糖尿病所出现的一系列血糖值,自我监测血糖仪的准确性。我们回顾性分析了107例妊娠期糖尿病患者的病例记录,每位患者同时进行了三次实验室血糖检测和血糖仪血糖检测。使用以下性能目标比较结果:(1)所有血糖仪的读数应在参考值的10%以内;(2)采用标准格式的误差网格分析以及适用于妊娠期糖尿病的修改版。我们还检查了与参考值的差异范围。近一半的值(47%)超出参考范围的10%(高于或低于)。近15%与参考范围的差异超过20%。标准误差网格分析显示,96%的值落在误差网格的A区,该区被认为是可接受的,100%的值落在A区和B区,这些差异通常被认为对治疗没有重大影响。误差网格分析的修改版表明,39%的值超出了可接受范围。在个体内部,相当数量(26%)的差异范围相互之间超过20%。尽管血糖仪给出的结果可能对于一般糖尿病护理是可接受的,但这些结果在妊娠期糖尿病管理方面仍令人担忧。鉴于在孕期尤其在决定是否开始或停止胰岛素治疗时需要精确性,护理人员需要认识到这些不准确性。