Livengood C H, Wrenn J W
Chlamydia Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Aug;39(8):2928-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2928-2932.2001.
We evaluated further the accuracy of the COBAS AMPLICOR (Roche) (CA) PCR-based system in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical specimens. Endocervical specimens collected for any indication for testing for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae among a university hospital health system population were included. Testing for C. trachomatis was done by two PCR methods, CA and manual microwell AMPLICOR (Roche) (MWA), and by culture; testing for N. gonorrhoeae was done by CA and culture. Discrepancy resolution was performed. Reproducibility testing and hands-on labor time measurements for CA were done. Among 654 C. trachomatis samples, the prevalence of true positivity was 9.2%, and among the 618 N. gonorrhoeae samples, the prevalence of true positivity was 4.4%. For detection of C. trachomatis, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were, respectively, as follows for each test: CA, 93.3, 99.7, 99.3, and 96.4%; MWA, 91.7, 99.7, 99.2, and 96.5%; and culture, 65.0, 100, 96.6, and 100%. For detection of N. gonorrhoeae those values were as follows: CA, 96.3, 100, 99.8, and 100%; and culture, 92.6, 100, 99.7, and 100%. Hands-on labor time for each clinical result was estimated to be at 7.5 min. The prevalence of inhibitory specimens was 3.5%, including two positive C. trachomatis samples which would have been missed otherwise. The direct cost of each clinical result with CA was estimated to be $9.09. Our methods include a diverse range of indications for testing among women, using endocervical swabbing samples, 2 M sucrose phosphate transport medium, and discrepancy resolution for comparison. Under our test conditions, the CA system is an accurate, rapid, and cost- and labor-efficient method for detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae.
我们进一步评估了COBAS AMPLICOR(罗氏公司)基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的系统检测宫颈标本中沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的准确性。纳入了在大学医院医疗系统人群中因任何沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌检测指征而采集的宫颈标本。沙眼衣原体检测采用两种PCR方法,即COBAS AMPLICOR(CA)和手工微孔AMPLICOR(罗氏公司)(MWA),以及培养法;淋病奈瑟菌检测采用CA和培养法。进行了结果差异分析。对CA进行了重复性检测和实际操作时间测量。在654份沙眼衣原体样本中,真阳性率为9.2%,在618份淋病奈瑟菌样本中,真阳性率为4.4%。对于沙眼衣原体检测,每种检测方法的敏感性、特异性、阴性和阳性预测值分别如下:CA为93.3%、99.7%、99.3%和96.4%;MWA为91.7%、99.7%、99.2%和96.5%;培养法为65.0%、100%、96.6%和100%。对于淋病奈瑟菌检测,这些值如下:CA为96.3%、100%、99.8%和100%;培养法为92.6%、100%、99.7%和100%。每个临床结果的实际操作时间估计为7.5分钟。抑制性标本的发生率为3.5%,包括两份沙眼衣原体阳性样本,否则这些样本会被漏检。CA每个临床结果的直接成本估计为9.09美元。我们的方法包括对女性进行检测的多种指征,采用宫颈拭子样本、2M蔗糖磷酸盐转运培养基,并进行结果差异分析以作比较。在我们的检测条件下,CA系统是一种准确、快速快速且快速且具有成本效益和劳动效率的检测沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的方法。