Whiley David M, Tapsall John W, Sloots Theo P
Clinical Virology Research Unit, Sir Albert Sakzewski Virus Research Centre, Royal Children's Hospital & Health Service District, Herston Road, Herston, Queensland, Australia 4029.
J Mol Diagn. 2006 Feb;8(1):3-15. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050045.
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae became available in the early 1990s. Although offering several advantages over traditional detection methods, N. gonorrhoeae NAATs do have some limitations. These include cost, risk of carryover contamination, inhibition, and inability to provide antibiotic resistance data. In addition, there are sequence-related limitations that are unique to N. gonorrhoeae NAATs. In particular, false-positive results are a major consideration. These primarily stem from the frequent horizontal genetic exchange occurring within the Neisseria genus, leading to commensal Neisseria species acquiring N. gonorrhoeae genes. Furthermore, some N. gonorrhoeae subtypes may lack specific sequences targeted by a particular NAAT. Therefore, NAAT false-negative results because of sequence variation may occur in some gonococcal populations. Overall, the N. gonorrhoeae species continues to present a considerable challenge for molecular diagnostics. The need to evaluate N. gonorrhoeae NAATs before their use in any new patient population and to educate physicians on the limitations of these tests is emphasized in this review.
用于检测淋病奈瑟菌的核酸扩增试验(NAATs)在20世纪90年代初问世。尽管与传统检测方法相比有诸多优势,但淋病奈瑟菌NAATs也存在一些局限性。这些局限性包括成本、携带污染风险、抑制作用以及无法提供抗生素耐药性数据。此外,淋病奈瑟菌NAATs还存在一些与序列相关的独特局限性。特别是,假阳性结果是一个主要问题。这些主要源于奈瑟菌属内频繁发生的水平基因交换,导致共生奈瑟菌物种获得淋病奈瑟菌基因。此外,一些淋病奈瑟菌亚型可能缺乏特定NAAT所靶向的特定序列。因此,由于序列变异,在某些淋球菌群体中可能会出现NAAT假阴性结果。总体而言,淋病奈瑟菌物种继续给分子诊断带来相当大的挑战。本综述强调了在将淋病奈瑟菌NAATs用于任何新患者群体之前进行评估以及对医生进行这些检测局限性教育的必要性。