Fuller D D, Davis T E, Denys G A, York M K
Wishard Health Services, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Aug;39(8):2933-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2933-2936.2001.
MYCO/F Lytic medium (MFL), a liquid medium developed for use with the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system, was compared to the Isolator system (IS) for the recovery of fungi and to the BACTEC 13A medium for the recovery of mycobacteria. Recovery of bacteria was compared to routine BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (AF) blood cultures. Microbial growth was detected in 203 (17%) of 1,166 blood cultures. Fifty-seven specimens were positive for fungi: 35 were positive with both IS and MFL; six were positive with IS only (three Candida albicans, one Histoplasma capsulatum, one Candida glabrata, and one Fusarium species isolate); three were positive with AF only (two C. albicans and one Candida parapsilosis isolate); and 13 were positive with MFL only (five C. glabrata, three C. albicans, two Candida krusei, two Candida tropicalis, and one C. parapsilosis isolate; P > 0.05 versus IS). Eighteen of 19 blood cultures positive for H. capsulatum grew in both IS and MFL, although the time to detection for MFL was greater. The mean time to detection for all fungi was 8.15 days for IS and 12.07 days for MFL. Seven hundred forty specimens were also cultured for mycobacteria with MFL and 13A. Forty-four grew mycobacteria; 38 were positive with both 13A and MFL; and 16 were positive with MFL only. Mycobacterium avium was recovered from 41 specimens; 36 were positive for both systems and 5 were positive for MFL alone. MFL was also compared to the AF bottle for the same 740 specimens. MFL and AF both detected 34 of the 40 clinically significant bacteria, while IS detected only 15 of 40. In summary, MFL is an excellent medium for the recovery of fungi, mycobacteria, and bacteria; however, the time to detection of H. capsulatum is increased.
MYCO/F 裂解培养基(MFL)是一种为配合 BACTEC 9240 血培养系统使用而研发的液体培养基,将其与用于分离真菌的 Isolator 系统(IS)以及用于分离分枝杆菌的 BACTEC 13A 培养基进行了比较。同时,将细菌的分离情况与常规的 BACTEC Plus 需氧/厌氧(AF)血培养进行了比较。在 1166 份血培养样本中,检测到 203 份(17%)有微生物生长。57 份样本真菌检测呈阳性:35 份在 IS 和 MFL 中均呈阳性;6 份仅在 IS 中呈阳性(3 份白色念珠菌、1 份荚膜组织胞浆菌、1 份光滑念珠菌和 1 份镰刀菌属分离株);3 份仅在 AF 中呈阳性(2 份白色念珠菌和 1 份近平滑念珠菌分离株);13 份仅在 MFL 中呈阳性(5 份光滑念珠菌、3 份白色念珠菌、2 份克鲁斯念珠菌、2 份热带念珠菌和 1 份近平滑念珠菌分离株;与 IS 相比,P>0.05)。19 份荚膜组织胞浆菌阳性的血培养样本中有 18 份在 IS 和 MFL 中均生长,不过 MFL 的检测时间更长。IS 检测所有真菌的平均时间为 8.15 天,MFL 为 12.07 天。另外,使用 MFL 和 13A 对 740 份样本进行了分枝杆菌培养。44 份培养出分枝杆菌;38 份在 13A 和 MFL 中均呈阳性;16 份仅在 MFL 中呈阳性。从 41 份样本中分离出鸟分枝杆菌;36 份在两个系统中均呈阳性,5 份仅在 MFL 中呈阳性。还将 MFL 与 AF 瓶针对同样的 740 份样本进行了比较。MFL 和 AF 在 40 份具有临床意义的细菌样本中均检测出 34 份,而 IS 仅检测出 40 份中的 15 份。总之,MFL 是分离真菌、分枝杆菌和细菌的优良培养基;然而,荚膜组织胞浆菌的检测时间有所增加。