Warneke C L, Davis M, De Moor C, Baranowski T
Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Jul;101(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00193-6.
This study sought to determine which of 2 fruit and vegetable food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) most closely approximated intake measured by the average of four 24-hour dietary recalls.
Participants completed either a 31-item FFQ (n = 70) or 7-item FFQ (n = 76) on 2 occasions approximately 2 weeks apart. During the interval between FFQs1 participants provided four 24-hour dietary recalls via telephone interview.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: Participants were 146 persons with food preparation responsibilities in families of students in grades 3 through 5. Respondents were predominantly African-American women in Atlanta, Ga.
Pearson correlation coefficients of log-transformed values estimated the reliability of each FFQ and compared FFQ estimates to reference values. The intraclass correlation coefficient evaluated consistency across 24-hour recalls.
The first FFQs overestimated intake approximately twofold. The 31-item FFQ estimates exceeded 7-item FFQ estimates by approximately 30% . Correlations with recall estimates were high for the 7-item FFQ and moderate to low for the 31-item FFQ. The second FFQ estimates were more highly correlated to reference values. From the first to the second administration, 7-item FFQ estimates dropped from 5.2 to 2.7 servings, and 31-item FFQ estimates dropped from 6.7 to 3.5 servings. Neither FFQ produced highly reliable estimates.
Mean total fruit and vegetable consumption was closer to reference estimates for the first 7-item FFQ and the second 31-item FFQ. The 7-item FFQ correlated more highly with reference estimates than did the 31-item FFQ. Therefore, we conclude that for African-American adults, a 1-time-administered FFQ using 7 broad food categories correlates more highly with reference values than a FFQ using 31 individual fruit and vegetable items.
本研究旨在确定两种水果和蔬菜食物频率问卷(FFQ)中哪一种最接近通过四次24小时饮食回忆的平均值所测量的摄入量。
参与者在大约相隔2周的两个时间段分别完成一份31项的FFQ(n = 70)或7项的FFQ(n = 76)。在两份FFQ之间的间隔期,参与者通过电话访谈提供四次24小时饮食回忆。
受试者/背景:参与者为146名在三至五年级学生家庭中负责食物准备的人员。受访者主要是佐治亚州亚特兰大的非裔美国女性。
对数转换值的Pearson相关系数估计了每份FFQ的可靠性,并将FFQ估计值与参考值进行比较。组内相关系数评估了24小时回忆之间的一致性。
第一份FFQ高估摄入量约两倍。31项FFQ的估计值比7项FFQ的估计值高出约30%。7项FFQ与回忆估计值的相关性较高,而31项FFQ的相关性为中度至低度。第二份FFQ估计值与参考值的相关性更高。从第一次到第二次调查,7项FFQ的估计值从5.2份降至2.7份,31项FFQ的估计值从6.7份降至3.5份。两份FFQ均未产生高度可靠的估计值。
对于第一份7项FFQ和第二份31项FFQ,水果和蔬菜的平均总消费量更接近参考估计值。7项FFQ与参考估计值的相关性高于31项FFQ。因此,我们得出结论,对于非裔美国成年人,使用7个宽泛食物类别的一次性FFQ与参考值的相关性高于使用31种单独水果和蔬菜项目的FFQ。