Staar S, Rudat V, Stuetzer H, Dietz A, Volling P, Schroeder M, Flentje M, Eckel H E, Mueller R P
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1161-71. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01544-9.
To demonstrate the efficacy of radiochemotherapy (RCT) as the first choice of treatment for advanced unresectable head-and-neck cancer. To prove an expected benefit of simultaneously given chemotherapy, a two-arm randomized study with hyperfractionated accelerated radiochemotherapy (HF-ACC-RCT) vs. hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HF-ACC-RT) was initiated. The primary endpoint was 1-year survival with local control (SLC).
Patients with Stage III and IV (UICC) unresectable oro- and hypopharyngeal carcinomas were randomized for HF-ACC-RCT with 2 cycles of 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)/day)/carboplatinum (70 mg/m(2)) on days 1--5 and 29--33 (arm A) or HF-ACC-RT alone (arm B). In both arms, there was a second randomization for testing the effect of prophylactically given G-CSF (263 microg, days 15--19) on mucosal toxicity. Total RT dose in both arms was 69.9 Gy in 38 days, with a concomitant boost regimen (weeks 1--3: 1.8 Gy/day, weeks 4 and 5: b.i.d. RT with 1.8 Gy/1.5 Gy). Between July 1995 and May 1999, 263 patients were randomized (median age 56 years; 96% Stage IV tumors, 4% Stage III tumors).
This analysis is based on 240 patients: 113 patients with RCT and 127 patients with RT, qualified for protocol and starting treatment. There were 178 oropharyngeal and 62 hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Treatment was tolerable in both arms, with a higher mucosal toxicity after RCT. Restaging showed comparable nonsignificant different CR + PR rates of 92.4% after RCT and 87.9% after RT (p = 0.29). After a median observed time of 22.3 months, l- and 2-year local-regional control (LRC) rates were 69% and 51% after RCT and 58% and 45% after RT (p = 0.14). There was a significantly better 1-year SLC after RCT (58%) compared with RT (44%, p = 0.05). Patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas showed significantly better SLC after RCT (60%) vs. RT (40%, p = 0.01); the smaller group of hypopharyngeal carcinomas had no statistical benefit of RCT (p = 0.84). For both tumor locations, prophylactically given G-CSF was a poor prognostic factor (Cox regression), and resulted in reduced LRC (log-rank test: +/- G-CSF, p = 0.0072).
With accelerated radiotherapy, the efficiency of simultaneously given chemotherapy may be not as high as expected when compared to standard fractionated RT. Oropharyngeal carcinomas showed better LRC after HF-ACC-RCT vs. HF-ACC-RT; hypopharyngeal carcinomas did not. Prophylactic G-CSF resulted in an unexpected reduced local control and should be given in radiotherapy regimen only with strong hematologic indication.
证明放化疗(RCT)作为晚期不可切除头颈癌首选治疗方法的疗效。为证实同步化疗的预期益处,启动了一项双臂随机研究,比较超分割加速放化疗(HF - ACC - RCT)与超分割加速放疗(HF - ACC - RT)。主要终点是1年局部控制生存率(SLC)。
Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期(UICC)不可切除的口咽和下咽癌患者被随机分为两组,A组接受HF - ACC - RCT,在第1 - 5天和第29 - 33天给予2周期的5 - 氟尿嘧啶(600mg/m²/天)/卡铂(70mg/m²);B组仅接受HF - ACC - RT。在两组中,进行了第二次随机分组以测试预防性给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(G - CSF,263μg,第15 - 19天)对黏膜毒性的影响。两组的总放疗剂量均为69.9Gy,分38天完成,采用同步推量方案(第1 - 3周:1.8Gy/天,第4和5周:每天两次放疗,剂量为1.8Gy/1.5Gy)。1995年7月至1999年5月,263例患者被随机分组(中位年龄56岁;96%为Ⅳ期肿瘤,4%为Ⅲ期肿瘤)。
该分析基于240例患者:113例接受RCT治疗,127例接受RT治疗,符合方案并开始治疗。其中口咽癌178例,下咽癌62例。两组治疗均可耐受,RCT后黏膜毒性更高。重新分期显示,RCT后CR + PR率为92.4%,RT后为87.9%,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.29)。中位观察时间22.3个月后,RCT后1年和2年的局部区域控制(LRC)率分别为69%和51%,RT后分别为58%和45%(p = 0.14)。RCT后1年SLC(58%)显著优于RT(44%,p = 0.05)。口咽癌患者RCT后的SLC(60%)显著优于RT(40%,p = 0.01);下咽癌患者较少,RCT无统计学益处(p = 0.84)。对于两个肿瘤部位,预防性给予G - CSF均是不良预后因素(Cox回归),并导致LRC降低(对数秩检验:±G - CSF,p = 0.0072)。
与标准分割放疗相比,在加速放疗时同步化疗的效果可能不如预期。HF - ACC - RCT治疗口咽癌后的LRC优于HF - ACC - RT;下咽癌则不然。预防性给予G - CSF导致局部控制意外降低,仅在有强烈血液学指征时才应在放疗方案中使用。