Scaramuzza A, Fernando G T, Crayford B B
Orange Base Hospital, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jul;27(7):1047-54. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00829-4.
To quantitatively compare the incidence of visually significant posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and lens epithelial cell (LEC) layer formation on the anterior surface of Hydroview hydrogel and AcrySof acrylic foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) after implantation.
Single-surgeon ophthalmology practice, Orange Base Hospital, and Dudley Private Hospital, Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
This retrospective study comprised 166 eyes of 150 patients (after exclusions) who had cataract extraction and insertion of a foldable IOL in the capsular bag by a single surgeon using a standardized phacoemulsification technique from December 1997 to September 1998. The mean follow-up was 13.1 months (range 6.0 to 23.6 months). The eyes were divided into 2 groups based on the type of IOL implanted: Storz Hydroview H60M (81 eyes) or Alcon AcrySof MA30BA (85 eyes). A neodymium:YAG posterior capsule laser capsulotomy (PC YAG) was performed for an objective decrease in Snellen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of more than 1 line, significant visual symptoms, or both. This was used as a measure of visually significant PCO. An Nd:YAG anterior surface clearance (ASC YAG) was done for LEC layer formation anterior to the IOL to better visualize or facilitate treatment of PCO. The rates of PC YAG and ASC YAG after Hydroview and AcrySof IOL implantation were statistically compared.
Forty-five eyes (55.6%) in the Hydroview IOL group and 3 eyes (3.5%) in the AcrySof IOL group required a PC YAG; the risk difference was 52.0% (P <.001). An ASC YAG was required in 27 eyes (33.3%) in the Hydroview group and 1 eye (1.2%) in the AcrySof group; the risk difference was 32.2% (P <.001). Survival analysis demonstrated that the only independent predictor of the incidence of PC YAG and ASC YAG over time was IOL type, with the Hydroview IOL group having a statistically significantly higher incidence of both procedures.
There was a greater incidence of visually significant PCO and LEC layer formation on the anterior surface of Hydroview IOLs than of AcrySof IOLs.
定量比较植入Hydroview水凝胶人工晶状体和AcrySof丙烯酸可折叠人工晶状体(IOL)后,具有视觉意义的后囊膜混浊(PCO)及晶状体上皮细胞(LEC)层在前表面形成的发生率。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州奥兰治市奥兰治基地医院和达德利私立医院的单医生眼科诊所。
这项回顾性研究纳入了150例患者的166只眼(排除后),这些患者于1997年12月至1998年9月由同一位医生采用标准化超声乳化技术在囊袋内进行了白内障摘除及可折叠IOL植入。平均随访时间为13.1个月(范围6.0至23.6个月)。根据植入的IOL类型将眼睛分为2组:Storz Hydroview H60M(81只眼)或爱尔康AcrySof MA30BA(85只眼)。当最佳矫正视力(BCVA)下降超过1行、出现明显视觉症状或两者兼具时,进行钕:钇铝石榴石后囊膜激光切开术(PC YAG),以此作为具有视觉意义的PCO的衡量标准。对IOL前表面的LEC层形成进行钕:钇铝石榴石前表面清除术(ASC YAG),以更好地观察或便于治疗PCO。对Hydroview和AcrySof IOL植入后PC YAG和ASC YAG的发生率进行统计学比较。
Hydroview IOL组中有45只眼(55.6%)需要进行PC YAG,AcrySof IOL组中有3只眼(3.5%)需要进行PC YAG;风险差异为52.0%(P <.001)。Hydroview组中有27只眼(33.3%)需要进行ASC YAG,AcrySof组中有1只眼(1.2%)需要进行ASC YAG;风险差异为32.2%(P <.001)。生存分析表明,随着时间推移,PC YAG和ASC YAG发生率的唯一独立预测因素是IOL类型,Hydroview IOL组这两种手术的发生率在统计学上显著更高。
Hydroview IOL前表面具有视觉意义的PCO及LEC层形成的发生率高于AcrySof IOL。