Million R R, Zimmermann R C
Cancer. 1975 Jun;35(6):1533-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197506)35:6<1533::aid-cncr2820350609>3.0.co;2-7.
A retrospective evaluation was made of 260 patients with squamous carcinoma of various head and neck sites in order to determine the relative value of continuous vs. split-course irradiation techniques. There was no obvious difference in local control or survival in early-stage cases. The continuous technique resulted in a better local control and survival rate in moderately advanced and advanced stages. Complications were less severe in the split-course cases.
对260例不同头颈部部位鳞状细胞癌患者进行回顾性评估,以确定连续照射技术与分段照射技术的相对价值。早期病例在局部控制或生存率方面无明显差异。连续照射技术在中晚期和晚期病例中局部控制和生存率更佳。分段照射病例的并发症较轻。