• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近端输尿管支架移位和再移位的最佳预防与管理

Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration.

作者信息

Breau R H, Norman R W

机构信息

Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):890-3.

PMID:11490240
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated issues associated with proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration, including causes and management, and the predictability of ureteral length.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All proximal ureteral stent migrations that occurred from January 1997 to March 2000 were reviewed. Characteristics and treatment of the 33 patients with proximal ureteral stent migration were compared with those of 66 randomly selected controls who did not have stent migration. We also analyzed a subgroup of 6 cases of remigration.

RESULTS

Of the ureteral stents 2% migrated proximally. Mean height was greater in patients with versus without a migrated stent (p = 0.028). The stent-to-ureter length ratio was lower in the migrated than in the nonmigrated group (p <0.0001). Patient height and side of migration were significant predictors of ureteral length (R2 = 0.3511, p <0.0001 and 0.0007, respectively). Of the patients who required continued ureteral stenting migrated stent management included placement of a longer stent in 9 (group 1) and a stent of equal length in 4 (group 2), and repositioning of the original stent in 4 (group 3). There was no remigration in group 1. However, migration recurred in 2 patients in group 2 (50%) and in all 4 in group 3 (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal migration occurs when a stent is too short for the ureter. We recommend that ureteral length should be measured directly from an x-ray to select the optimal stent length. If it is necessary to continue stenting a ureter after migration has been detected, a longer stent should be placed.

摘要

目的

我们评估了与近端输尿管支架移位和再移位相关的问题,包括原因、处理方法以及输尿管长度的可预测性。

材料与方法

回顾了1997年1月至2000年3月期间发生的所有近端输尿管支架移位情况。将33例近端输尿管支架移位患者的特征和治疗方法与66例随机选择的未发生支架移位的对照患者进行比较。我们还分析了6例再移位患者的亚组情况。

结果

输尿管支架近端移位的发生率为2%。发生支架移位的患者平均身高高于未发生移位的患者(p = 0.028)。移位组的支架与输尿管长度比低于未移位组(p <0.0001)。患者身高和移位侧是输尿管长度的重要预测因素(R2 = 0.3511,p分别<0.0001和0.0007)。在需要继续进行输尿管支架置入的患者中,移位支架的处理方法包括:9例置入更长的支架(第1组),4例置入等长的支架(第2组),4例重新放置原支架(第3组)。第1组未发生再移位。然而,第2组有2例患者(50%)再次发生移位,第3组的4例患者均(100%)再次发生移位。

结论

当支架对于输尿管来说太短时会发生近端移位。我们建议应通过X线直接测量输尿管长度以选择最佳的支架长度。如果在检测到移位后仍有必要继续对输尿管进行支架置入,应置入更长的支架。

相似文献

1
Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration.近端输尿管支架移位和再移位的最佳预防与管理
J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):890-3.
2
Re: optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration.
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1802.
3
Proximal ureteral stent migration: an avoidable complication?近端输尿管支架移位:一种可避免的并发症?
J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):58-61.
4
[Removal of migrated ureteral stent with a Fogarty catheter].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1993 Jan;39(1):65-7.
5
Re: Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration.
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):202.
6
15-year experience with the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with indwelling ureteral stents.使用留置输尿管支架治疗输尿管外梗阻的15年经验。
J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):592-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000130510.28768.f5.
7
Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life.输尿管支架:发病率及对生活质量的影响。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Aug;7(8):491-4.
8
Through-the-scope double colonic stenting in the management of inoperable proximal malignant colonic obstruction: a pilot study.经内镜双结肠支架置入术治疗无法手术的近端恶性结肠梗阻:一项初步研究
Endoscopy. 2004 May;36(5):426-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814332.
9
Retrieval of migrated ureteral stent by intussusception of ureteral balloon dilator tip.通过输尿管球囊扩张器尖端套叠取出移位的输尿管支架。
Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):571-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.046.
10
Assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in patients with self-retaining ureteral stents: implications for upper urinary tract instillation.留置输尿管支架患者膀胱输尿管反流的评估:对上尿路灌注的影响
J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):890-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000147747.89028.64.

引用本文的文献

1
Forgotten ureteral stents: a systematic review of literature.被遗忘的输尿管支架:文献系统综述。
BMC Urol. 2024 Mar 5;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01440-9.
2
A case of proximal migration of a double-J ureteral stent in a patient with metastatic gastric cancer.一名转移性胃癌患者双J型输尿管支架近端移位病例
J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Aug 28;2023(8):rjad488. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjad488. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Ureteral stent complications - experience on 50,000 procedures.输尿管支架并发症 - 50000 例经验。
J Med Life. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):769-775. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0352.
4
Comparison of ureteral stent diameters on ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.输尿管支架直径与输尿管支架相关症状的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Turk J Urol. 2022 Jan;48(1):30-40. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.21255.
5
Double J stent migration as renal penetration.双J管移位至肾实质内。
Urol Case Rep. 2021 Jun 22;39:101759. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101759. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Preoperative estimate of natural ureteral length based on computed tomography and/or plain radiography.基于计算机断层扫描和/或普通放射摄影术的术前自然输尿管长度预估。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 9;11(1):12202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91658-6.
7
Implementation of Supine Percutaneous Nephroscopic Surgery to Remove an Upward Migration of Ureteral Catheter in Infancy: A Case Report.婴儿期仰卧位经皮肾镜手术治疗输尿管导管上移1例报告
Res Rep Urol. 2021 May 5;13:215-219. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S309894. eCollection 2021.
8
Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature.留置输尿管支架:使用模式与命名法
Arab J Urol. 2020 May 19;18(4):241-246. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1761675.
9
Removal of an intra-renal migrated ureteral stent through a percutaneous nephroscopy in a 2-year-old child.经皮肾镜取出一名2岁儿童肾内移位的输尿管支架。
Urol Case Rep. 2020 Nov 6;34:101482. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101482. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
Comparison of outcomes between 2 week versus 4 week stenting in pediatric pyeloplasty-A single centre observational study.小儿肾盂成形术中2周与4周支架置入术的疗效比较——一项单中心观察性研究
Asian J Urol. 2020 Oct;7(4):327-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 2.