Suppr超能文献

推进式小肠镜检查需要使用外套管吗?

Do we need the overtube for push-enteroscopy?

作者信息

Benz C, Jakobs R, Riemann J F

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2001 Aug;33(8):658-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16208.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Push-enteroscopy is well established in many gastroenterological departments. There is no agreement about whether the use of an overtube is helpful to optimize the depth of insertion. In this prospective and randomized study we investigated the effect of the overtube for push-type enteroscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 1999 and August 2000, 80 patients (47 male, 33 female; age 63.1, range 20 - 90 years), who underwent investigation by push-enteroscopy were randomly allocated to two groups. Group T underwent investigation with the Olympus push-enteroscope SIF 100 with an overtube and group NT without an overtube. The length of insertion was estimated by fluoroscopy, by counting the folds of the small bowel and by insertion length in centimeters, while the scope was drawn back to the pylorus. The number of pathological findings was documented and patient comfort was measured by means of a standard questionnaire completed after enteroscopy.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, indication for enteroscopy and pathological findings. There was a highly significant correlation between the length of insertion measured in centimeters and the counted folds in both groups (correlation 0.57, P < 0.001 in group T; 0.80, P < 0.001 in group NT). The length of insertion estimated by means of fluoroscopy was not reliable in determination of the exact length of insertion. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the insertion depth between group T (mean values: insertion length 72.4 cm, counted folds 99.3) and group NT (mean values: insertion length 60.8 cm, counted folds 74.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an overtube in push-enteroscopy is advantageous with respect to the depth of insertion (significant difference between group T and NT in counted folds and the insertion depth in centimeters). At this time, this gain of insertion length did not result in a higher rate of pathological findings. Nevertheless, we would recommend the use of an overtube in performing push-type enteroscopy in order to increase the number of pathological findings.

摘要

背景与目的

推进式小肠镜检查在许多胃肠病科已得到广泛应用。对于使用外套管是否有助于优化插入深度,目前尚无定论。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们调查了外套管在推进式小肠镜检查中的作用。

患者与方法

1999年8月至2000年8月期间,80例接受推进式小肠镜检查的患者(男47例,女33例;年龄63.1岁,范围20 - 90岁)被随机分为两组。T组使用带有外套管的奥林巴斯推进式小肠镜SIF 100进行检查,NT组不使用外套管。当内镜回撤至幽门时,通过透视、计数小肠皱襞以及以厘米为单位的插入长度来估计插入长度。记录病理发现的数量,并通过小肠镜检查后完成的标准问卷来衡量患者的舒适度。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、小肠镜检查指征和病理发现方面具有可比性。两组中以厘米为单位测量的插入长度与计数的皱襞之间均存在高度显著相关性(T组相关性为0.57,P < 0.001;NT组相关性为0.80,P < 0.001)。通过透视估计的插入长度在确定准确插入长度方面并不可靠。T组(平均值:插入长度72.4 cm,计数皱襞99.3)与NT组(平均值:插入长度60.8 cm,计数皱襞74.1)之间的插入深度存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

在推进式小肠镜检查中使用外套管在插入深度方面具有优势(T组和NT组在计数皱襞和以厘米为单位的插入深度方面存在显著差异)。此时,插入长度的增加并未导致更高的病理发现率。尽管如此,为了增加病理发现的数量,我们建议在进行推进式小肠镜检查时使用外套管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验