Manthorpe R, Jacobsson L T, Kirtava Z, Theander E
Sjögren's Syndrome Research Centre, Department of Rheumatology, Malmö University Hospital, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1998 Feb;149(1):7-11.
During the last decades different sets of criteria have been used for defining primary Sjögren's syndrome. Using these criteria prevalence estimates have varied between 0.04%-4.8%. This hundred-fold distribution in estimated frequency is partly due to differences in age groups studied, classification criteria used and methods used for objective evaluation of lachrymal and salivary gland hypofunction. Another problem which makes comparison between studies difficult is that workshop recommendations for the various objective tests are very often not strictly followed. Population based studies tend to identify cases with less severe disease and higher prevalence rates. Furthermore, there seems to be little correlation between dryness symptoms reported by subjects and objective hypofunction of lachrymal and/or salivary glands. Possible explanations to these findings include selection bias towards more severe cases in clinical (university) studies and a low predictive value for some criteria in population studies.
在过去几十年中,不同的标准集被用于定义原发性干燥综合征。使用这些标准,患病率估计值在0.04%至4.8%之间变化。估计频率的这种百倍差异部分归因于所研究年龄组的差异、所使用的分类标准以及用于客观评估泪腺和唾液腺功能减退的方法。另一个使研究之间难以比较的问题是,各种客观测试的研讨会建议常常没有得到严格遵循。基于人群的研究倾向于识别病情较轻且患病率较高的病例。此外,受试者报告的干燥症状与泪腺和/或唾液腺的客观功能减退之间似乎几乎没有相关性。对这些发现的可能解释包括临床(大学)研究中对更严重病例的选择偏倚以及人群研究中某些标准的预测价值较低。