Aakko E, Schafer E, Gyarmathy V A, Narita E, Remington P
Wisconsin Tobacco Control Program, Madison, USA.
WMJ. 2001;100(3):67-9.
Although Wisconsin's clean indoor air law prohibits or restricts smoking in certain areas, it specifically exempts manufacturing and assembly workplaces from its provisions. We conducted a mail survey of 1500 randomly selected employers to determine the nature and extent of smoking policies in Wisconsin's blue-collar workforce. Of the 1042 (70%) respondents, 49% prohibit all smoking; 26% allow smoking only in designated areas; 18% allow smoking in all areas except designated non-smoking areas; and 7% allow smoking anywhere. Larger employers were more likely to have smoking policies. Of the 61% of respondents who indicated having a formal smoking policy, the reasons for having the policy were safety (40%), health (38%), or employee request (12%). For those employers without a smoking policy, the main reasons were that few employees smoke (37%), the decision is left to the employee's discretion (32%), or employees may object to having a policy (10%). About half of the employees in manufacturing and assembly workplaces continue to be exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.
尽管威斯康星州的室内空气清洁法禁止或限制在某些区域吸烟,但该法明确规定制造和装配工作场所不受其条款限制。我们对1500名随机挑选的雇主进行了邮件调查,以确定威斯康星州蓝领劳动力吸烟政策的性质和范围。在1042名(70%)受访者中,49%禁止所有吸烟行为;26%只允许在指定区域吸烟;18%允许在除指定无烟区外的所有区域吸烟;7%允许在任何地方吸烟。规模较大的雇主更有可能制定吸烟政策。在表示有正式吸烟政策的61%的受访者中,制定该政策的原因是安全(40%)、健康(38%)或员工要求(12%)。对于那些没有吸烟政策的雇主,主要原因是吸烟的员工很少(37%)、决定权留给员工自行决定(32%)或员工可能反对制定政策(10%)。制造和装配工作场所约一半的员工仍暴露在环境烟草烟雾中。