Suppr超能文献

脾脏创伤计算机断层扫描中“对比剂外溢”表现的意义。

Implications of the "contrast blush" finding on computed tomographic scan of the spleen in trauma.

作者信息

Omert L A, Salyer D, Dunham C M, Porter J, Silva A, Protetch J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):272-7; discussion 277-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200108000-00008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The "contrast blush" (CB) computed tomographic (CT) scan finding has often been used clinically as an indicator for therapeutic splenic intervention (SI) (splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or angiographic embolization). We sought to examine the prognostic significance of this finding.

METHODS

The records and CT scans of 324 trauma patients from two Level I trauma centers who had blunt splenic injury and a CT scan of the abdomen within 24 hours of admission were reviewed and screened for CB.

RESULTS

CB was identified in 11% of patients, and its incidence was significantly related to the grade of injury: grade I/II, 3.2%; grade III, 11.8%; and grade IV/V, 26.3% (p < 0.001). SI was also related to the grade: grade I/II, 7.7%; grade III, 37.6%; and grade IV/V, 69.7% (p < 0.001). The chance of having SI was greater in those with CB (75.0%) when compared with those without CB (25.0%) (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 9.2). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that SI correlated independently with splenic grade, emergency department hypotension, and age, but did not demonstrate a correlation with CB.

CONCLUSION

CB is not an absolute indication for an operative or angiographic intervention. Factors such as patient age, grade of injury, and presence of hypotension need to be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

摘要

背景

“对比剂外溢”(CB)这一计算机断层扫描(CT)表现常被临床用作脾治疗性干预(SI)(脾切除术、脾修补术或血管造影栓塞术)的指标。我们试图研究这一表现的预后意义。

方法

回顾并筛选了来自两家一级创伤中心的324例创伤患者的记录和CT扫描资料,这些患者均为钝性脾损伤且在入院后24小时内进行了腹部CT扫描,以查找是否存在CB。

结果

11%的患者发现有CB,其发生率与损伤分级显著相关:Ⅰ/Ⅱ级,3.2%;Ⅲ级,11.8%;Ⅳ/Ⅴ级,26.3%(p<0.001)。SI也与损伤分级相关:Ⅰ/Ⅱ级,7.7%;Ⅲ级,37.6%;Ⅳ/Ⅴ级,69.7%(p<0.001)。与无CB的患者(25.0%)相比,有CB的患者接受SI的几率更高(75.0%)(p<0.001;优势比,9.2)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,SI与脾损伤分级、急诊科低血压及年龄独立相关,但与CB无相关性。

结论

CB并非手术或血管造影干预的绝对指征。在这些患者的临床管理中,需要考虑患者年龄、损伤分级及低血压等因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验