Suppr超能文献

[微型钛板内固定与钢丝骨固定治疗面中部骨折的比较]

[Comparison of internal fixation with mini-titanium plate and wire osteosynthesis in midface fractures].

作者信息

Wu H, Zhu Z, Li Y

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Medical University, Changsha, 410011.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Mar;15(2):120-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical results of the internal fixation with wire and the internal fixation with mini-titanium plate in midface fractures.

METHODS

By the coronal approach and supplementary incisions, forty patients with midface fractures were treated with wire osteosynthesis or rigid internal fixation (RIF) with mini-titanium plate.

RESULTS

A good stability can not he obtained with wire osteosynthesis in the treatment of midface fractures. The supporting bony structure of midface can be reconstructed with mini-titanium plate RIF, which results in a sufficient three-dimensional stability of the fractured segments and an ideal facial configuration Mini-titanium plate RIF is more convenient and reliable than wire osteosynthesis in the difficult operation fields of the infraorbital margin and zygomaticomaxillary suture.

CONCLUSION

Mini-titanium plate RIF is the best method for treatment of midface fractures.

摘要

目的

比较钢丝内固定与微型钛板内固定治疗面中部骨折的临床效果。

方法

采用冠状切口及辅助切口,对40例面中部骨折患者采用钢丝骨缝合或微型钛板坚强内固定(RIF)治疗。

结果

钢丝骨缝合治疗面中部骨折无法获得良好的稳定性。微型钛板RIF可重建面中部的支持性骨结构,使骨折段获得足够的三维稳定性及理想的面部外形。在眶下缘和颧上颌缝等手术难度较大的区域,微型钛板RIF比钢丝骨缝合更方便、可靠。

结论

微型钛板RIF是治疗面中部骨折的最佳方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验