Wu H, Zhu Z, Li Y
Department of Stomatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Medical University, Changsha, 410011.
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1999 Mar;15(2):120-2.
To compare clinical results of the internal fixation with wire and the internal fixation with mini-titanium plate in midface fractures.
By the coronal approach and supplementary incisions, forty patients with midface fractures were treated with wire osteosynthesis or rigid internal fixation (RIF) with mini-titanium plate.
A good stability can not he obtained with wire osteosynthesis in the treatment of midface fractures. The supporting bony structure of midface can be reconstructed with mini-titanium plate RIF, which results in a sufficient three-dimensional stability of the fractured segments and an ideal facial configuration Mini-titanium plate RIF is more convenient and reliable than wire osteosynthesis in the difficult operation fields of the infraorbital margin and zygomaticomaxillary suture.
Mini-titanium plate RIF is the best method for treatment of midface fractures.
比较钢丝内固定与微型钛板内固定治疗面中部骨折的临床效果。
采用冠状切口及辅助切口，对40例面中部骨折患者采用钢丝骨缝合或微型钛板坚强内固定（RIF）治疗。
钢丝骨缝合治疗面中部骨折无法获得良好的稳定性。微型钛板RIF可重建面中部的支持性骨结构，使骨折段获得足够的三维稳定性及理想的面部外形。在眶下缘和颧上颌缝等手术难度较大的区域，微型钛板RIF比钢丝骨缝合更方便、可靠。
微型钛板RIF是治疗面中部骨折的最佳方法。
