Clark Kenneth, Reader Al, Beck Mike, Meyers William J
College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43218-2357, USA.
Anesth Prog. 2002 Spring;49(2):49-55.
The purpose of this prospective, randomized, blinded study was to measure the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with an inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block followed by an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth. Through use of a repeated-measures design, 40 patients randomly received 3 injection combinations at 3 separate appointments: an IAN block followed by a mock lingual infiltration and a mock labial infiltration, an IAN block followed by a mock lingual infiltration and a labial infiltration, and an IAN block followed by a mock labial infiltration and a lingual infiltration. Each IAN block used 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and each infiltration used 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered over the lateral incisor apex. Mandibular anterior teeth were blindly pulp tested at 2-minute cycles for 60 minutes following the IAN-infiltration injections. No response from the patient to the maximum output (80 reading) of the pulp tester was used as the criterion for pulpal anesthesia. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained within 15 minutes and the 80 reading was sustained for 60 minutes. Anesthesia was considered a failure if 2 consecutive 80 readings were not obtained during the 60 minutes. The results of this study showed that 100% of the patients had lip numbness with all IAN blocks. For the lateral incisor, the success rate of the IAN block alone was 40% and the failure rate was 30%. For the IAN block plus labial infiltration, the success rate was 62% and the failure rate was 12% for the lateral incisor. There was a significant difference (P < .05) between the IAN block alone and the IAN block plus labial infiltration. In conclusion, a labial infiltration, over the lateral incisor apex, of 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine following an IAN block significantly improved pulpal anesthesia for the lateral incisor compared with the IAN block alone.
这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究的目的是测量在下牙槽神经(IAN)阻滞之后再对下颌前牙进行浸润麻醉所获得的牙髓麻醉程度。通过采用重复测量设计,40名患者在3次单独的就诊中随机接受3种注射组合:IAN阻滞之后进行模拟舌侧浸润和模拟唇侧浸润;IAN阻滞之后进行模拟舌侧浸润和唇侧浸润;IAN阻滞之后进行模拟唇侧浸润和舌侧浸润。每次IAN阻滞使用3.6 mL含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因,每次浸润使用1.8 mL含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因,在侧切牙根尖上方给药。在IAN阻滞加浸润注射后,以2分钟为周期对下颌前牙进行60分钟的牙髓盲测。患者对牙髓测试仪的最大输出值(80读数)无反应被用作牙髓麻醉的标准。当在15分钟内连续获得2次80读数且80读数持续60分钟时,麻醉被认为成功。如果在60分钟内未连续获得2次80读数,则麻醉被认为失败。这项研究的结果表明,所有IAN阻滞均使100%的患者出现唇部麻木。对于侧切牙,单纯IAN阻滞的成功率为40%,失败率为30%。对于IAN阻滞加唇侧浸润,侧切牙的成功率为62%,失败率为12%。单纯IAN阻滞与IAN阻滞加唇侧浸润之间存在显著差异(P <.05)。总之,与单纯IAN阻滞相比,在IAN阻滞之后于侧切牙根尖上方浸润1.8 mL含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因可显著改善侧切牙的牙髓麻醉效果。