Fernández G, de Greiff A, von Oertzen J, Reuber M, Lun S, Klaver P, Ruhlmann J, Reul J, Elger C E
Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, 53105 Bonn, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2001 Sep;14(3):585-94. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0854.
Neurosurgical interventions often require the presurgical determination of language dominance or mapping of language areas. Results obtained by fMRI are closely correlated with invasive procedures such as electrical stimulation mapping or the intracarotid amobarbital test. However, language fMRI is not used routinely, because postprocessing is time-consuming. We utilized a real-time analysis software installed directly on the MR console computer and SPM99 as reference postprocessing software. We assessed the reliability of the immediate determination of language dominance based on individual activation maps by comparing the results of the visual analysis of images derived from conventional postprocessing with those produced by the real-time tool. All images were rated independently by six senior neurologists blinded to other data. We validated the robustness of the real-time method statistically by comparing global and regional lateralization indices derived from real-time and postprocessing analysis. Functional MRI was performed with a standard 1.5-T whole-body scanner. Brain activity was contrasted between an alternating semantic judgment and letter matching task. Twelve right-handed, healthy control subjects and 12 consecutive patients with drug-resistant, localization-related epilepsy were investigated. The semantic condition induced almost invariably left hemispheric activations in Broca's area, the premotor cortex, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the temporoparietal region. Although real-time analysis reduced noise less effectively than SPM99, visual ratings and lateralization indices produced highly concordant results with both methods. In conclusion, real-time fMRI, as used here, allowed reliable language lateralization and mapping in less than 15 min during routine clinical MRI investigation with no need for postprocessing.
神经外科手术干预通常需要在术前确定语言优势半球或绘制语言区域图谱。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)获得的结果与诸如电刺激图谱或颈动脉内阿米妥试验等侵入性检查密切相关。然而,语言fMRI并未常规使用,因为其后期处理耗时。我们使用了直接安装在磁共振控制台计算机上的实时分析软件,并将SPM99作为参考后期处理软件。通过比较传统后期处理生成图像的视觉分析结果与实时工具生成的结果,我们评估了基于个体激活图谱立即确定语言优势半球的可靠性。所有图像均由六位对其他数据不知情的资深神经科医生独立评分。我们通过比较实时分析和后期处理分析得出的全局和区域偏侧化指数,从统计学上验证了实时方法的稳健性。使用标准的1.5-T全身扫描仪进行功能磁共振成像。在交替语义判断和字母匹配任务之间对比脑活动。对12名右利手健康对照者和12名连续的药物难治性、定位相关癫痫患者进行了研究。语义条件几乎总是在布罗卡区、运动前皮质、背外侧前额叶皮质和颞顶叶区域诱发左半球激活。尽管实时分析在降低噪声方面不如SPM99有效,但两种方法的视觉评分和偏侧化指数产生了高度一致的结果。总之,本文所使用的实时fMRI能够在常规临床磁共振成像检查期间不到15分钟的时间内实现可靠的语言偏侧化和图谱绘制,且无需后期处理。