Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Mar;227(2):573-586. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02323-7. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Functional and anatomical hemispheric asymmetries abound in the neural language system, yet the relationship between them remains elusive. One attractive proposal is that structural interhemispheric differences reflect or even drive functional language laterality. However, studies on structure-function couplings either find that left and right language dominant individuals display similar leftward structural asymmetry or yield inconsistent results. The current study aimed to replicate and extend prior work by comparing structural asymmetries between neurologically healthy left-handers with right hemispheric language dominance (N = 24) and typically lateralized left-handed controls (N = 39). Based on structural MRI data, anatomical measures of six 'language-related' perisylvian structures were derived, including the surface area of five gray matter regions with known language functions and the FDC (combined fiber density and fiber-bundle cross-sectional area) of the arcuate fasciculus. Only the surface area of the pars triangularis and the anterior insula differed significantly between participant groups, being on average leftward asymmetric in those with typical dominance, but right lateralized in volunteers with atypical language specialization. However, these findings did not survive multiple testing correction and the asymmetry of these structures demonstrated much inter-individual variability in either subgroup. By integrating our findings with those reported previously we conclude that while some perisylvian anatomical asymmetries may differ subtly between typical and atypical speech dominants at the group level, they serve as poor participant-specific predictors of hemispheric language specialization.
神经语言系统中存在丰富的功能和解剖半球不对称,但它们之间的关系仍然难以捉摸。一个有吸引力的假设是,结构的半球间差异反映甚至驱动功能语言的偏侧性。然而,关于结构-功能耦合的研究要么发现左、右语言优势个体表现出相似的左向结构不对称,要么得出不一致的结果。本研究旨在通过比较具有右半球语言优势的神经健康左撇子(N=24)和典型偏侧化左撇子对照组(N=39)之间的结构不对称来复制和扩展先前的工作。基于结构 MRI 数据,得出了六个“语言相关”的侧脑室周围结构的解剖学测量值,包括五个具有已知语言功能的灰质区域的表面积和弓状束的 FDC(纤维密度和纤维束横截面积的组合)。只有三角部和前岛叶的表面积在参与者组之间存在显著差异,在具有典型优势的个体中平均呈左不对称性,但在具有非典型语言专业化的志愿者中呈右偏侧化。然而,这些发现没有通过多重测试校正存活下来,这些结构的不对称性在任何一个亚组中都表现出很大的个体间变异性。通过将我们的发现与以前报道的发现相结合,我们得出结论,虽然在群体水平上,一些侧脑室周围的解剖不对称性在典型和非典型言语优势者之间可能略有不同,但它们作为半球语言专业化的个体特异性预测指标较差。