• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

75岁以上老年患者的霍顿病:临床病程、皮质激素治疗并发症。164例患者的比较研究。关于降低初始剂量的探讨

[Horton's disease in elderly patients aged over 75: clinical course, complications of corticotherapy. Comparative study of 164 patients. Towards a reduced initial dose].

作者信息

Chevalet P, Barrier J H, Glémarec J, el Kouri D, Hamidou M, de Wazières B, Duhamel E, Jégo P, Maugars Y, Planchon B, Rodat O

机构信息

Service de gériatrie, Hôpital Saint-Jacques, 85, rue Saint-Jacques, 44093 Nantes, France.

出版信息

Rev Med Interne. 2001 Jul;22(7):624-30. doi: 10.1016/s0248-8663(01)00399-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0248-8663(01)00399-x
PMID:11508155
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our study compares clinical and therapeutic courses (corticosteroid response, corticosteroid amount, complications) in people with giant cell arteritis before and over 75 years, during the first year of treatment.

METHODS

A series of 164 patients was retrospectively analysed (mean age: 73.3 years) among the two subgroups: before 75 and over 75 years. Patient received (monitoring of reduction in the corticosteroid dosage) a 240 mg intravenous bolus of methylprednisolone followed by 0.5 or 0.7 mg/kg/d of prednisone, or 0.7 mg/kg/d of prednisone without the bolus.

RESULTS

Corticosteroid response was identical for the two groups, before and over 75 (patients with corticoresistance: 15% vs 11.4%; NS) and giant cell arteritis-related complications were equivalent (n = 2 vs n = 2; NS). Corticosteroid load was slightly lower in the elderly group (cumulative dose of corticosteroids during the first year of treatment 5.2 g vs 5.8 g; P = 0.03). Patients with rheumatic side effects (collapses of vertebral bodies, mainly) were more frequent in the elderly group (15.5% vs 4.3%; P = 0.01), in spite of a limited mean follow-up period (10.7 months).

CONCLUSION

Even if steroid response was identical in the therapeutic course of giant cell arteritis, rheumatic side effects appeared more frequent in the elderly group (over 75 years). In order to obtain a corticosteroid-sparing effect, new studies are necessary to evaluate a reduced initial dosage of corticosteroids.

摘要

目的

我们的研究比较了巨细胞动脉炎患者在治疗的第一年中,年龄在75岁及75岁以上和75岁以下人群的临床及治疗过程(皮质类固醇反应、皮质类固醇用量、并发症)。

方法

对两个亚组(75岁以下和75岁及75岁以上)的164例患者(平均年龄:73.3岁)进行回顾性分析。患者接受(监测皮质类固醇剂量的减少情况)静脉推注240毫克甲泼尼龙,随后给予0.5或0.7毫克/千克/天的泼尼松,或不进行推注直接给予0.7毫克/千克/天的泼尼松。

结果

两组(75岁以下和75岁及75岁以上)的皮质类固醇反应相同(皮质类固醇抵抗患者:15%对11.4%;无统计学差异),且与巨细胞动脉炎相关的并发症相当(分别为2例对2例;无统计学差异)。老年组的皮质类固醇负荷略低(治疗第一年皮质类固醇的累积剂量为5.2克对5.8克;P = 0.03)。尽管平均随访期有限(10.7个月),但老年组出现风湿性副作用(主要是椎体塌陷)的患者更为常见(15.5%对4.3%;P = 0.01)。

结论

即使在巨细胞动脉炎的治疗过程中类固醇反应相同,但老年组(75岁以上)出现风湿性副作用的情况更为频繁。为了获得皮质类固醇节省效应,有必要开展新的研究来评估降低皮质类固醇的初始用量。

相似文献

1
[Horton's disease in elderly patients aged over 75: clinical course, complications of corticotherapy. Comparative study of 164 patients. Towards a reduced initial dose].75岁以上老年患者的霍顿病:临床病程、皮质激素治疗并发症。164例患者的比较研究。关于降低初始剂量的探讨
Rev Med Interne. 2001 Jul;22(7):624-30. doi: 10.1016/s0248-8663(01)00399-x.
2
A randomized, multicenter, controlled trial using intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone in the initial treatment of simple forms of giant cell arteritis: a one year followup study of 164 patients.一项使用静脉注射甲泼尼龙脉冲疗法对简单型巨细胞动脉炎进行初始治疗的随机、多中心对照试验:164例患者的一年随访研究
J Rheumatol. 2000 Jun;27(6):1484-91.
3
[Non-complicated Horton's disease: initial treatment with methylprednisolone 500 mg/day bolus for three days followed by 20 mg/day prednisone-equivalent. Evaluation of 15 patients].[非复杂性霍顿氏病:初始治疗采用甲泼尼龙500毫克/天静脉推注,持续三天,随后给予相当于泼尼松20毫克/天。对15例患者的评估]
Rev Med Interne. 2001 Nov;22(11):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/s0248-8663(01)00468-4.
4
[Bolus of methylprednisolone and Horton's disease/rhizomelic pseudo-polyarthritis. Preliminary results of a pilot study of treating the bolus with low doses of corticoids].
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1992;143(2):85-8.
5
Treatment of giant cell arteritis using induction therapy with high-dose glucocorticoids: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized prospective clinical trial.使用大剂量糖皮质激素诱导疗法治疗巨细胞动脉炎:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机前瞻性临床试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct;54(10):3310-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22163.
6
Efficacy and adverse effects of different corticosteroid dose regimens in temporal arteritis: a retrospective study.不同皮质类固醇剂量方案治疗颞动脉炎的疗效及不良反应:一项回顾性研究
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1997 May-Jun;15(3):303-6.
7
[Simple Horton's syndrome: modalities of treatment].
Presse Med. 2004 Jan 24;33(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/s0755-4982(04)98474-6.
8
[Principles of acute treatment of Horton's disease. Role of high-dose corticosteroid therapy].
Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1998 Nov;149(7):448-53.
9
Combined treatment of giant-cell arteritis with methotrexate and prednisone. a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.甲氨蝶呤与泼尼松联合治疗巨细胞动脉炎:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jan 16;134(2):106-14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-2-200101160-00010.
10
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of methotrexate in the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA).一项关于甲氨蝶呤治疗巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)的前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001 Sep-Oct;19(5):495-501.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of life of patients treated for giant cell arteritis: a case-control study.巨细胞动脉炎治疗患者的生活质量:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;36(9):2055-2062. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3619-4. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
2
Hospitalized infections in giant cell arteritis: a population-based retrospective cohort study.巨细胞动脉炎的住院感染:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
J Rheumatol. 2014 Dec;41(12):2447-51. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140124. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
3
Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis in older patients: diagnosis and pharmacological management.
老年患者的巨细胞动脉炎和风湿性多肌痛:诊断和药物治疗管理。
Drugs Aging. 2011 Aug 1;28(8):651-66. doi: 10.2165/11592500-000000000-00000.
4
Giant cell arteritis.巨细胞动脉炎
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Sep;79(935):511-5. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.935.511.