White R S
Yale University School of Medicine, USA. R&
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2001 Spring;49(2):427-55. doi: 10.1177/00030651010490021901.
The traditional Freudian and interpersonal schools of psychoanalysis diverged during the psychoanalytic wars in New York in the 1940s. Each has developed from a different set of assumptions concerning the mind, especially the role of structure and the role of interaction. Recent developments in both schools in the last twenty years suggest a convergence and overlap in theory and technique. The relevant history of the divergence is examined and the work of three contemporary interpersonal writers explored in depth. That work is contrasted with contemporary developments in traditional Freudian psychoanalysis.
传统的弗洛伊德精神分析学派和人际关系学派在20世纪40年代纽约的精神分析论战期间分道扬镳。二者都从关于心理的不同假设发展而来，尤其是结构的作用和互动的作用。在过去二十年里，这两个学派的最新发展表明在理论和技术上出现了趋同和重叠。本文考察了二者分道扬镳的相关历史，并深入探讨了三位当代人际关系学派作家的作品。该作品与传统弗洛伊德精神分析的当代发展形成对比。
