相似文献
1
Biomedical policy. NIH wins an exemption from HHS peer-review overhaul.
Science. 2001 Aug 17;293(5533):1234. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5533.1234a.
2
Biomedical politics. NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list.
Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):758. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5646.758.
3
Growing pains for NIH grant review.
Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):823-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.020.
4
Biomedical funding. NIH keeps grants staff but braces for change.
Science. 2004 Jan 23;303(5657):451. doi: 10.1126/science.303.5657.451b.
5
A metareview at the NIH.
Nat Med. 2008 Apr;14(4):351. doi: 10.1038/nm0408-351.
6
NIH budget. Peer review under stress.
Science. 2007 Apr 20;316(5823):358-9. doi: 10.1126/science.316.5823.358.
7
Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
Cell. 2008 Oct 17;135(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.051.
8
NIH peer review: time for some changes.
Nat Biotechnol. 1998 May;16(5):395. doi: 10.1038/nbt0598-395a.
9
Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
Science. 2001 Nov 9;294(5545):1255-7. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5545.1255.
10
Most researchers favor NIH policy that requires less information, survey finds.
Chron High Educ. 2005 Aug 12;LI(49):A22.
Zotero 插件