NIH peer review: time for some changes.
出版信息
Nat Biotechnol. 1998 May;16(5):395. doi: 10.1038/nbt0598-395a.
PMID:9592372
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
NIH peer review: time for some changes.
Nat Biotechnol. 1998 May;16(5):395. doi: 10.1038/nbt0598-395a.
2
New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
Nat Med. 2006 Jan;12(1):5. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-5a.
3
Growing pains for NIH grant review.
Cell. 2006 Jun 2;125(5):823-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.020.
4
Conflict-of-interest debate stirs mixed reaction at NIH.
Nature. 1994 Feb 3;367(6462):401. doi: 10.1038/367401b0.
5
NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Mar;33(3):15-6. doi: 10.1038/laban0304-15.
6
Shortening of NIH RO1 grant applications: your response is important.
DNA Repair (Amst). 2007 Jan 4;6(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
7
NIH opens conflict-of-interest investigation.
Nat Med. 1999 Feb;5(2):129-30. doi: 10.1038/5479.
8
Why China needs an NIH.
Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):679. doi: 10.1038/428679b.
9
National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1404. doi: 10.1126/science.320.5882.1404.
10
Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
Cell. 2008 Oct 17;135(2):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.051.
Zotero 插件