Gaebler C, Berger U, Schandelmaier P, Greitbauer M, Schauwecker H H, Applegate B, Zych G, Vécsei V
Department of Traumatology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Aug;15(6):415-23. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200108000-00006.
A multicenter trial analyzed complications and odds for complications in open and closed tibial fractures stabilized by small diameter nails.
Retrospective.
Four Level I trauma centers.
Four hundred sixty-seven tibial fractures were included in the study. There were fifty-two proximal fractures, 219 midshaft fractures, and 196 distal fractures. Breakdown into different AO/OTA groups showed 135 Type A fractures, 216 Type B fractures, and 116 Type C fractures. Two hundred sixty-five were closed fractures and 202 were open fractures.
Clinical and radiographic analysis.
467 patients' tibial fractures were stabilized with small diameter tibial nails using an unreamed technique. Indications for the use of small diameter tibial nails using an unreamed technique included all types of open or closed diaphyseal fractures. The operating surgeons decided whether or not to ream based on personal experience, fracture type, and soft-tissue damage. Surgeons of Center 1 preferred to treat AO Type A and B fractures with unreamed nails, and surgeons of Centers 2, 3, and 4 preferred to treat AO Type B and C fractures with unreamed nails. Closed and open fractures were treated in approximately the same ratio.
Analysis showed five (1.1 percent) deep infections (with a 5.4 percent rate of deep infections in Gustilo Grade III open fractures), forty-three delayed unions (9.2 percent), and twelve (2.6 percent) nonunions. Compartment syndromes occurred in sixty-two cases (13.3 percent), screw fatigue in forty-seven cases (10 percent), and fatigue failure of the tibial nail in three cases (0.6 percent).
Fracture distraction of more than three millimeters should not be tolerated when stabilizing tibial fractures with unreamed, small-diameter nails as this increases the odds of having a delayed union by twelve times (p < 0.001) and a nonunion by four times (p = 0.057). There was a significant increase of complications in the group of Grade III open fractures (p < 0.001), AO/OTA Type C fractures (p = 0.002), and to a lesser extent in distal fractures. However, the rate of severe complications resulting in major morbidity was low.
一项多中心试验分析了采用小直径髓内钉固定的开放性和闭合性胫骨骨折的并发症及发生并发症的几率。
回顾性研究。
四个一级创伤中心。
467例胫骨骨折纳入本研究。其中有52例近端骨折、219例骨干骨折和196例远端骨折。按不同AO/OTA分组显示,A型骨折135例、B型骨折216例、C型骨折116例。闭合性骨折265例,开放性骨折202例。
临床及影像学分析。
对467例患者的胫骨骨折采用非扩髓技术,使用小直径胫骨髓内钉固定。采用非扩髓技术使用小直径胫骨髓内钉的适应证包括所有类型的开放性或闭合性骨干骨折。主刀医生根据个人经验、骨折类型和软组织损伤情况决定是否扩髓。中心1的医生倾向于用非扩髓髓内钉治疗AO A型和B型骨折,中心2、3和4的医生倾向于用非扩髓髓内钉治疗AO B型和C型骨折。闭合性和开放性骨折的治疗比例大致相同。
分析显示有5例(1.1%)深部感染(GustiloⅢ级开放性骨折深部感染率为5.4%)、43例(9.2%)延迟愈合和12例(2.6%)不愈合。骨筋膜室综合征发生62例(13.3%),螺钉疲劳47例(10%),胫骨髓内钉疲劳断裂3例(0.6%)。
采用非扩髓小直径髓内钉固定胫骨骨折时,不应耐受超过3毫米的骨折断端分离,因为这会使延迟愈合几率增加12倍(p<0.001),不愈合几率增加4倍(p=0.057)。Ⅲ级开放性骨折组(p<0.001)、AO/OTA C型骨折组(p=0.002)并发症显著增加,远端骨折组并发症增加程度较小。然而,导致严重致残的严重并发症发生率较低。