Xu-Friedman M A, Harris K M, Regehr W G
Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Neurosci. 2001 Sep 1;21(17):6666-72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06666.2001.
Cerebellar Purkinje cells receive two distinctive types of excitatory inputs. Climbing fiber (CF) synapses have a high probability of release and show paired-pulse depression (PPD), whereas parallel fiber (PF) synapses facilitate and have a low probability of release. We examined both types of synapses using serial electron microscopic reconstructions in 15-d-old rats to look for anatomical correlates of these differences. PF and CF synapses were distinguishable by their overall ultrastructural organization. There were differences between PF and CF synapses in how many release sites were within 1 microm of a mitochondrion (67 vs 84%) and in the degree of astrocytic ensheathment (67 vs 94%). However, the postsynaptic density sizes for both types of synapses were similar (0.13-0.14 microm(2)). For both types of synapses, we counted the number of docked vesicles per release site to test whether this number determines the probability of release and synaptic plasticity. PF and CF synapses had the same number of anatomically docked vesicles (7-8). The number of docked vesicles at the CF does not support a simple model of PPD in which release of a single vesicle during the first pulse depletes the anatomically docked vesicle pool at a synapse. Alternatively, only a fraction of anatomically docked vesicles may be release ready, or PPD could result from multivesicular release at each site. Similarities in the number of docked vesicles for PF and CF synapses indicate that differences in probability of release are unrelated to the number of anatomically docked vesicles at these synapses.
小脑浦肯野细胞接受两种不同类型的兴奋性输入。攀缘纤维(CF)突触具有较高的释放概率并表现出双脉冲抑制(PPD),而平行纤维(PF)突触具有易化作用且释放概率较低。我们在15日龄大鼠中使用连续电子显微镜重建技术检查了这两种类型的突触,以寻找这些差异的解剖学相关因素。PF和CF突触可通过其整体超微结构组织加以区分。PF和CF突触在距离线粒体1微米范围内的释放位点数量(分别为67%和84%)以及星形胶质细胞包绕程度(分别为67%和94%)方面存在差异。然而,两种类型突触的突触后致密区大小相似(0.13 - 0.14平方微米)。对于这两种类型的突触,我们计算了每个释放位点对接囊泡的数量,以测试该数量是否决定释放概率和突触可塑性。PF和CF突触在解剖学上对接的囊泡数量相同(7 - 8个)。CF处对接囊泡的数量不支持PPD的简单模型,即第一个脉冲期间单个囊泡的释放会耗尽突触处解剖学上对接的囊泡池。或者,解剖学上对接的囊泡中可能只有一部分准备好释放,或者PPD可能是由每个位点的多泡释放导致的。PF和CF突触对接囊泡数量的相似性表明,释放概率的差异与这些突触处解剖学上对接的囊泡数量无关。