Effects of dietary fibre on digesta passage, nutrient digestibility, and gastrointestinal tract morphology in the granivorous Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).

To investigate digestive tract performance in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus), food intake and digestibility, digesta passage rate, and gastrointestinal tract morphology were measured in captive animals fed low- or high-fibre diets. We used two markers (Co-ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid for solutes and Cr-mordanted cell walls for particles) to measure differential passage rates of digesta fractions in order to test for the presence of a colonic separation mechanism (CSM). Although dry-matter intakes on the high-fibre diet did not differ from those on the low-fibre diet, digestibilities of dry matter, neutral-detergent fibre, acid-detergent fibre, crude protein, and crude fat were all significantly lower on the high-fibre diet. Gross energy intake on the high-fibre diet also did not differ from that on the low-fibre diet, but energy lost in faeces was much higher than on the low-fibre diet; thus, energy digestibility and digestible energy intake were significantly lower on the high-fibre diet. The lengths and dry-tissue masses of all segments of the gastrointestinal tract tended to enlarge in response to increased dietary fibre, but only the total tract contents, contents of the small intestine, and length and dry-tissue mass of the caecum increased significantly. The mean retention time (MRT) of the particle marker was significantly greater than that of the solute marker on the low-fibre but not the high-fibre diet; the solute/particle differential retention ratio was 0.62 on the low-fibre diet and 0.90 on the high-fibre diet. Thus, there was no evidence for selective retention of the solute marker on either diet. The MRT of the particle marker was significantly lower on the high-fibre diet and in the same direction as the MRT of the solute marker. These results suggest that the granivorous Mongolian gerbil has no CSM but can adjust its digestive tract capacity to accommodate greater quantities of low-quality food.