Suppr超能文献

仅以干草为食时,两种食粪性物种(兔子和豚鼠)的摄食、选择、食糜保留、消化和肠道充盈。

Intake, selection, digesta retention, digestion and gut fill of two coprophageous species, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus), on a hay-only diet.

机构信息

Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2011 Oct;95(5):564-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01084.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

Abstract

A colonic separation mechanism (CSM) is the prerequisite for the digestive strategy of coprophagy. Two different CSM are known in small herbivores, the 'wash-back' CSM of lagomorphs and the 'mucous-trap' CSM of rodents. Differences between these groups in their digestive pattern when fed exclusively hay were investigated in six rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and six guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus). Intake, digestibility (by total faecal collection), solute and particle mean retention times (MRT, using Co-EDTA and Cr-mordanted fibres) were measured. Rabbits selected less fibrous parts of the hay than guinea pigs, leaving orts with higher content of neutral detergent fibre [NDF; 721 ± 21 vs. 642 ± 31 g/kg dry matter (DM) in guinea pigs]. They also expressed a lower NDF digestibility (0.44 ± 0.10 vs. 0.55 ± 0.05 of total), a similar particle MRT (15 ± 3 vs. 18 ± 6 h), a longer solute MRT (51 ± 9 vs. 16 ± 4 h), and a lower calculated dry matter gut fill (19.6 ± 4.7 vs. 29.7 ± 4.1 g DM/kg body mass) than guinea pigs (p < 0.05 for each variable). These results support the assumption that the 'wash-back' CSM, exhibited in the rabbits, is more efficient in extracting bacterial matter from the colonic digesta plug than the 'mucous-trap' CSM found in the guinea pigs. Related to metabolic body mass, rabbits therefore need a less capacious colon for their CSM where a more efficient bacteria wash-out is reflected in the lower fibre digestibility. A lighter digestive tract could contribute to a peculiarity of lagomorphs: their ability to run faster than other similar-sized mammals.

摘要

盲肠分离机制(CSM)是食粪消化策略的前提。在小型草食动物中,已知有两种不同的 CSM,兔形目动物的“反向冲洗”CSM 和啮齿动物的“黏液陷阱”CSM。在专门喂食干草时,研究了这两组动物在消化模式上的差异,实验对象为 6 只兔子(Oryctolagus cuniculus)和 6 只豚鼠(Cavia porcellus)。通过总粪便收集法测量了摄入量、消化率(用总粪便收集法)、溶质和颗粒平均停留时间(MRT,用 Co-EDTA 和 Cr-鞣酸纤维)。兔子选择的干草中纤维含量较少的部分,而留下的残渣中中性洗涤纤维[NDF;721±21 比 642±31 g/kg 干物质(DM)在豚鼠中]含量更高。它们的 NDF 消化率也较低(0.44±0.10 比 0.55±0.05 总)、颗粒 MRT 相似(15±3 比 18±6 h)、溶质 MRT 较长(51±9 比 16±4 h),以及计算得出的干物质肠道填充率较低(19.6±4.7 比 29.7±4.1 g DM/kg 体重),这些都低于豚鼠(每个变量的 p 值均<0.05)。这些结果支持这样一种假设,即兔子表现出的“反向冲洗”CSM 从盲肠内容物栓中提取细菌物质的效率高于豚鼠中发现的“黏液陷阱”CSM。与代谢体重相关,兔子的 CSM 所需的盲肠容量较小,这反映出其细菌冲洗效率更高,纤维消化率更低。更轻的消化道可能有助于兔形目动物的一个特有特征:它们能够比其他类似大小的哺乳动物跑得更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验